The Inflatable Mini Anne® Manikin May be Used as an Inexpensive Alternative to a Standard Life-size Resuscitation Manikin During Instructor-led BLS/AED Training - A Randomized Controlled Study

Camilla Bang; Anna-Sophie N Cordsen; Masja B Hoe; Stinne E Rasmussen; Mette A Nebsbjerg; Kasper Glerup Lauridsen; Mathilde Stærk; Katrine Bjørnshave Bomholt; Bo Løfgren

The Inflatable Mini Anne® Manikin May be Used as an Inexpensive Alternative to a Standard Life-size Resuscitation Manikin During Instructor-led BLS/AED Training - A Randomized Controlled Study

Camilla Bang, Anna-Sophie N Cordsen, Masja B Hoe, Stinne E Rasmussen, Mette A Nebsbjerg, Kasper Glerup Lauridsen, Mathilde Stærk, Katrine Bjørnshave Bomholt, Bo Løfgren

Institut for Klinisk Medicin - Center for Akutforskning

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Konferenceabstrakt i tidsskrift › Forskning › peer review

Abstract

Introduction: The inflatable and inexpensive Mini Anne® resuscitation manikin is widely used with a self-instruction video and allows dissemination of BLS/AED skills to large groups. The learning outcome following instructor-led BLS/AED training using a Mini Anne® compared to a standard life-size manikin is currently unknown.Aim: To compare skills among laypersons following BLS/AED training using either the Mini Anne® or a standard life-size manikin.Methods: We randomized laypersons to use either the Mini Anne® (Laerdal) or a standard life-size manikin (Resusci Anne®, Laerdal) for instructor-led BLS/AED training. All participants underwent an end-of-course test on an AMBU® Man-manikin (AMBU). The primary endpoint: performing all steps of the European Resuscitation Council BLS/AED algorithm correctly (passing the test). Secondary endpoints: CPR quality parameters and manikin preference.Results: In total, 100 laypersons were randomized 1:1 to train on Mini Anne® (mean (SD) age: 53 (14), male: 24%) or a standard life-size manikin (mean age: 56 (16), male: 42%). There were no differences in pass-rate (14% vs 16%, p=1.0), in chest compression depth (54 (11) mm vs 59 (11) mm, p=0.06), chest compression rate (92 (17) min-1 vs 96 (16) min-1, p=0.27) or effective ventilations (50% vs 29%, p=0.36) in the Mini Anne®-group and standard life-size manikin-group, respectively. Among all participants, 91% preferred the standard life-size manikin.Conclusion: BLS/AED skills from instructor-led training using the Mini Anne® manikin was not significantly different compared with training on a standard life-size manikin. The Mini Anne® manikin may be used as an inexpensive alternative to a standard life-size resuscitation manikin.Author Disclosures: C. Bang: None. A.N. Cordsen: None. M.B. Hoe: None. S.E. Rasmussen: None. M.A. Nebsbjerg: None. K.G. Lauridsen: None. M. Stærk: None. K. Bjørnshave: None. B. Løfgren: None.

Originalsprog	Dansk
Tidsskrift	Circulation
Vol/bind	136
Nummer	Suppl 1
Sider (fra-til)	A20087
ISSN	0009-7322
Status	Udgivet - 14 nov. 2017

Adgang til dokumentet

http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/136/Suppl_1/A20087.abstract

Citationsformater

Bang, C., Cordsen, A.-S. N., Hoe, M. B., Rasmussen, S. E., Nebsbjerg, M. A., Glerup Lauridsen, K., Stærk, M., Bomholt, K. B., & Løfgren, B. (2017). The Inflatable Mini Anne® Manikin May be Used as an Inexpensive Alternative to a Standard Life-size Resuscitation Manikin During Instructor-led BLS/AED Training - A Randomized Controlled Study. Circulation, 136(Suppl 1), A20087. http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/136/Suppl_1/A20087.abstract

@article{e8d0d64f257d4273a1b11944f9f81fdf,

title = "The Inflatable Mini Anne{\textregistered} Manikin May be Used as an Inexpensive Alternative to a Standard Life-size Resuscitation Manikin During Instructor-led BLS/AED Training - A Randomized Controlled Study",

abstract = "Introduction: The inflatable and inexpensive Mini Anne{\textregistered} resuscitation manikin is widely used with a self-instruction video and allows dissemination of BLS/AED skills to large groups. The learning outcome following instructor-led BLS/AED training using a Mini Anne{\textregistered} compared to a standard life-size manikin is currently unknown.Aim: To compare skills among laypersons following BLS/AED training using either the Mini Anne{\textregistered} or a standard life-size manikin.Methods: We randomized laypersons to use either the Mini Anne{\textregistered} (Laerdal) or a standard life-size manikin (Resusci Anne{\textregistered}, Laerdal) for instructor-led BLS/AED training. All participants underwent an end-of-course test on an AMBU{\textregistered} Man-manikin (AMBU). The primary endpoint: performing all steps of the European Resuscitation Council BLS/AED algorithm correctly (passing the test). Secondary endpoints: CPR quality parameters and manikin preference.Results: In total, 100 laypersons were randomized 1:1 to train on Mini Anne{\textregistered} (mean (SD) age: 53 (14), male: 24%) or a standard life-size manikin (mean age: 56 (16), male: 42%). There were no differences in pass-rate (14% vs 16%, p=1.0), in chest compression depth (54 (11) mm vs 59 (11) mm, p=0.06), chest compression rate (92 (17) min-1 vs 96 (16) min-1, p=0.27) or effective ventilations (50% vs 29%, p=0.36) in the Mini Anne{\textregistered}-group and standard life-size manikin-group, respectively. Among all participants, 91% preferred the standard life-size manikin.Conclusion: BLS/AED skills from instructor-led training using the Mini Anne{\textregistered} manikin was not significantly different compared with training on a standard life-size manikin. The Mini Anne{\textregistered} manikin may be used as an inexpensive alternative to a standard life-size resuscitation manikin.Author Disclosures: C. Bang: None. A.N. Cordsen: None. M.B. Hoe: None. S.E. Rasmussen: None. M.A. Nebsbjerg: None. K.G. Lauridsen: None. M. St{\ae}rk: None. K. Bj{\o}rnshave: None. B. L{\o}fgren: None.",

author = "Camilla Bang and Cordsen, {Anna-Sophie N} and Hoe, {Masja B} and Rasmussen, {Stinne E} and Nebsbjerg, {Mette A} and {Glerup Lauridsen}, Kasper and Mathilde St{\ae}rk and Bomholt, {Katrine Bj{\o}rnshave} and Bo L{\o}fgren",

year = "2017",

month = nov,

day = "14",

language = "Dansk",

volume = "136",

pages = "A20087",

journal = "Circulation",

issn = "0009-7322",

publisher = "AHA/ASA",

number = "Suppl 1",

}

Bang, C, Cordsen, A-SN, Hoe, MB, Rasmussen, SE , Nebsbjerg, MA , Glerup Lauridsen, K , Stærk, M , Bomholt, KB & Løfgren, B 2017, 'The Inflatable Mini Anne® Manikin May be Used as an Inexpensive Alternative to a Standard Life-size Resuscitation Manikin During Instructor-led BLS/AED Training - A Randomized Controlled Study', Circulation, bind 136, nr. Suppl 1, s. A20087. <http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/136/Suppl_1/A20087.abstract>

The Inflatable Mini Anne® Manikin May be Used as an Inexpensive Alternative to a Standard Life-size Resuscitation Manikin During Instructor-led BLS/AED Training - A Randomized Controlled Study. / Bang, Camilla; Cordsen, Anna-Sophie N; Hoe, Masja B et al.
I: Circulation, Bind 136, Nr. Suppl 1, 14.11.2017, s. A20087.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Konferenceabstrakt i tidsskrift › Forskning › peer review

TY - ABST

T1 - The Inflatable Mini Anne® Manikin May be Used as an Inexpensive Alternative to a Standard Life-size Resuscitation Manikin During Instructor-led BLS/AED Training - A Randomized Controlled Study

AU - Bang, Camilla

AU - Cordsen, Anna-Sophie N

AU - Hoe, Masja B

AU - Rasmussen, Stinne E

AU - Nebsbjerg, Mette A

AU - Glerup Lauridsen, Kasper

AU - Stærk, Mathilde

AU - Bomholt, Katrine Bjørnshave

AU - Løfgren, Bo

PY - 2017/11/14

Y1 - 2017/11/14

N2 - Introduction: The inflatable and inexpensive Mini Anne® resuscitation manikin is widely used with a self-instruction video and allows dissemination of BLS/AED skills to large groups. The learning outcome following instructor-led BLS/AED training using a Mini Anne® compared to a standard life-size manikin is currently unknown.Aim: To compare skills among laypersons following BLS/AED training using either the Mini Anne® or a standard life-size manikin.Methods: We randomized laypersons to use either the Mini Anne® (Laerdal) or a standard life-size manikin (Resusci Anne®, Laerdal) for instructor-led BLS/AED training. All participants underwent an end-of-course test on an AMBU® Man-manikin (AMBU). The primary endpoint: performing all steps of the European Resuscitation Council BLS/AED algorithm correctly (passing the test). Secondary endpoints: CPR quality parameters and manikin preference.Results: In total, 100 laypersons were randomized 1:1 to train on Mini Anne® (mean (SD) age: 53 (14), male: 24%) or a standard life-size manikin (mean age: 56 (16), male: 42%). There were no differences in pass-rate (14% vs 16%, p=1.0), in chest compression depth (54 (11) mm vs 59 (11) mm, p=0.06), chest compression rate (92 (17) min-1 vs 96 (16) min-1, p=0.27) or effective ventilations (50% vs 29%, p=0.36) in the Mini Anne®-group and standard life-size manikin-group, respectively. Among all participants, 91% preferred the standard life-size manikin.Conclusion: BLS/AED skills from instructor-led training using the Mini Anne® manikin was not significantly different compared with training on a standard life-size manikin. The Mini Anne® manikin may be used as an inexpensive alternative to a standard life-size resuscitation manikin.Author Disclosures: C. Bang: None. A.N. Cordsen: None. M.B. Hoe: None. S.E. Rasmussen: None. M.A. Nebsbjerg: None. K.G. Lauridsen: None. M. Stærk: None. K. Bjørnshave: None. B. Løfgren: None.

AB - Introduction: The inflatable and inexpensive Mini Anne® resuscitation manikin is widely used with a self-instruction video and allows dissemination of BLS/AED skills to large groups. The learning outcome following instructor-led BLS/AED training using a Mini Anne® compared to a standard life-size manikin is currently unknown.Aim: To compare skills among laypersons following BLS/AED training using either the Mini Anne® or a standard life-size manikin.Methods: We randomized laypersons to use either the Mini Anne® (Laerdal) or a standard life-size manikin (Resusci Anne®, Laerdal) for instructor-led BLS/AED training. All participants underwent an end-of-course test on an AMBU® Man-manikin (AMBU). The primary endpoint: performing all steps of the European Resuscitation Council BLS/AED algorithm correctly (passing the test). Secondary endpoints: CPR quality parameters and manikin preference.Results: In total, 100 laypersons were randomized 1:1 to train on Mini Anne® (mean (SD) age: 53 (14), male: 24%) or a standard life-size manikin (mean age: 56 (16), male: 42%). There were no differences in pass-rate (14% vs 16%, p=1.0), in chest compression depth (54 (11) mm vs 59 (11) mm, p=0.06), chest compression rate (92 (17) min-1 vs 96 (16) min-1, p=0.27) or effective ventilations (50% vs 29%, p=0.36) in the Mini Anne®-group and standard life-size manikin-group, respectively. Among all participants, 91% preferred the standard life-size manikin.Conclusion: BLS/AED skills from instructor-led training using the Mini Anne® manikin was not significantly different compared with training on a standard life-size manikin. The Mini Anne® manikin may be used as an inexpensive alternative to a standard life-size resuscitation manikin.Author Disclosures: C. Bang: None. A.N. Cordsen: None. M.B. Hoe: None. S.E. Rasmussen: None. M.A. Nebsbjerg: None. K.G. Lauridsen: None. M. Stærk: None. K. Bjørnshave: None. B. Løfgren: None.

M3 - Konferenceabstrakt i tidsskrift

SN - 0009-7322

VL - 136

SP - A20087

JO - Circulation

JF - Circulation

IS - Suppl 1

ER -