The Impact of Collaboration on the Epistemic Cultures of Science

K. Brad Wray

The Impact of Collaboration on the Epistemic Cultures of Science

K. Brad Wray

Institut for Matematik - Videnskabsstudier

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/proceeding › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › peer review

9 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

This chapter examines how collaborative research affects the epistemic cultures of science. It begins by arguing that some groups of scientists hold views that are irreducibly the views of the group. The chapter also examines some normative issues that have arisen in the epistemic cultures of science. First, it considers how collaborative research threatens to erode the traditional notion of authorship in science. Second, it examines how collaborative research in science affects refereeing. The chapter argues that the norms of authorship and the refereeing practices have not developed to address the challenges encountered in the cultures of science where collaborative research is commonplace.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Titel	Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge : New Essays
Redaktører	Thomas Boyer-Kassem, Conor Mayo-Wilson, Michael Weisberg
Antal sider	18
Udgivelsessted	Oxford
Forlag	Oxford University Press
Publikationsdato	1 jan. 2017
Udgave	1
Sider	117-134
Kapitel	6
ISBN (Trykt)	978-0-19-068053-4
ISBN (Elektronisk)	9780190680534
Status	Udgivet - 1 jan. 2017

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

Citationsformater

@inbook{97874af6f3e545a78960d4c1e3c3688d,

title = "The Impact of Collaboration on the Epistemic Cultures of Science",

abstract = "This chapter examines how collaborative research affects the epistemic cultures of science. It begins by arguing that some groups of scientists hold views that are irreducibly the views of the group. The chapter also examines some normative issues that have arisen in the epistemic cultures of science. First, it considers how collaborative research threatens to erode the traditional notion of authorship in science. Second, it examines how collaborative research in science affects refereeing. The chapter argues that the norms of authorship and the refereeing practices have not developed to address the challenges encountered in the cultures of science where collaborative research is commonplace.",

keywords = "Authorship, Big Science, Social Epistemology, collaboration, refereeing, scientific publications",

author = "Wray, {K. Brad}",

year = "2017",

month = jan,

day = "1",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-0-19-068053-4",

pages = "117--134",

editor = "Thomas Boyer-Kassem and Conor Mayo-Wilson and Michael Weisberg",

booktitle = "Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge",

publisher = "Oxford University Press",

edition = "1",

}

The Impact of Collaboration on the Epistemic Cultures of Science. / Wray, K. Brad.
Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge: New Essays. red. / Thomas Boyer-Kassem; Conor Mayo-Wilson; Michael Weisberg. 1. udg. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. s. 117-134.

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/proceeding › Bidrag til bog/antologi › Forskning › peer review

TY - CHAP

T1 - The Impact of Collaboration on the Epistemic Cultures of Science

AU - Wray, K. Brad

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - This chapter examines how collaborative research affects the epistemic cultures of science. It begins by arguing that some groups of scientists hold views that are irreducibly the views of the group. The chapter also examines some normative issues that have arisen in the epistemic cultures of science. First, it considers how collaborative research threatens to erode the traditional notion of authorship in science. Second, it examines how collaborative research in science affects refereeing. The chapter argues that the norms of authorship and the refereeing practices have not developed to address the challenges encountered in the cultures of science where collaborative research is commonplace.

AB - This chapter examines how collaborative research affects the epistemic cultures of science. It begins by arguing that some groups of scientists hold views that are irreducibly the views of the group. The chapter also examines some normative issues that have arisen in the epistemic cultures of science. First, it considers how collaborative research threatens to erode the traditional notion of authorship in science. Second, it examines how collaborative research in science affects refereeing. The chapter argues that the norms of authorship and the refereeing practices have not developed to address the challenges encountered in the cultures of science where collaborative research is commonplace.

KW - Authorship

KW - Big Science

KW - Social Epistemology

KW - collaboration

KW - refereeing

KW - scientific publications

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049443000&partnerID=8YFLogxK

M3 - Book chapter

SN - 978-0-19-068053-4

SP - 117

EP - 134

BT - Scientific Collaboration and Collective Knowledge

A2 - Boyer-Kassem, Thomas

A2 - Mayo-Wilson, Conor

A2 - Weisberg, Michael

PB - Oxford University Press

CY - Oxford

ER -

The Impact of Collaboration on the Epistemic Cultures of Science

Abstract

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater