-
Uddannelse
Find uddannelse
Studievejledning
Kvalitet
- Forskning
-
Samarbejde
Virksomheder
Kommuner og regioner
Gymnasier
Myndigheder
-
Om AU
Organisation
Kontakt
Om AU
- Organisation
- Ledelse
- Strategi
- AU i tal
- AU's historie
- Internationalt samarbejde
- Bæredygtighed
- Campus 2.0
- Diversitet og ligestilling
- Ledige stillinger
- Presse
- Kontakt
The history of the dichotomy of civic Western and ethnic Eastern nationalism
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
Dokumenter
- The history of the dichotomy of civic Western and ethnic Eastern nationalism_AM
Accepteret manuskript, 467 KB, PDF-dokument
DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2021.2007526
Forlagets udgivne version
The dichotomy of civic vs. ethnic nationalism has long been applied spatially to explain differences between ‘Western’ and ‘Eastern’ manifestations of nationalism. Though frequently criticised on empirical, methodological, and normative grounds, this dualism continues to find widespread use in nationalism studies. Through a genealogical study of the dichotomy’s emergence and evolution from Hans Kohn to John Plamenatz and Ernest Gellner, the article traces its strong ties to discourses and policies of ‘Western’ superiority, and to demi-orientalising constructions of ‘Eastern Europe’ as the inferior other of the ‘civilized West’.
| Originalsprog | Engelsk |
|---|---|
| Tidsskrift | National Identities |
| Vol/bind | 24 |
| Nummer | 5 |
| Sider (fra-til) | 505-522 |
| Antal sider | 18 |
| ISSN | 1460-8944 |
| DOI | |
| Status | Udgivet - 2022 |
Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater
Download-statistik
ID: 227299949