Aarhus Universitets segl

The Health Impacts of Two Policies Regulating SO2 Air Pollution: Evidence from China

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

The Health Impacts of Two Policies Regulating SO2 Air Pollution: Evidence from China. / Eriksson, Tor; Wang, Yuze; Luo, Nengshen.
I: China Economic Review, Bind 78, 101937, 04.2023.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Eriksson T, Wang Y, Luo N. The Health Impacts of Two Policies Regulating SO2 Air Pollution: Evidence from China. China Economic Review. 2023 apr.;78:101937. doi: 10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101937

Author

Eriksson, Tor ; Wang, Yuze ; Luo, Nengshen. / The Health Impacts of Two Policies Regulating SO2 Air Pollution: Evidence from China. I: China Economic Review. 2023 ; Bind 78.

Bibtex

@article{0559c698180a4ca883a3bdbbc0a3232f,
title = "The Health Impacts of Two Policies Regulating SO2 Air Pollution: Evidence from China",
abstract = "In developing countries widespread air pollution poses a major threat to public health calling for effective environmental regulation. This paper adds to the limited literature on the health impact of different environmental regulations. Using data from eight waves of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1993–2015), we employ a difference-in-differences model to investigate the health impact of two policies combatting SO 2 air pollution: the command-and-control environmental regulation represented by the Two Control Zones (TCZ) and the market-oriented environmental regulation represented by the SO 2 Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). The main findings are that the TCZ policy resulted in a 39% reduction in the 4-week prevalence of air pollution-related diseases through channels such as reducing industrial SO 2 emissions and industrial fumes emissions, and increasing individuals' amounts of physical exercise. In contrast, the ETS had no positive health effects, likely due to imperfect market mechanisms and environmental policy uncertainties. The health impact of the TCZ was most pronounced for respiratory illnesses, and was increasing over the period during which the policy was implemented. The positive health impact is stronger for outdoor, less educated, and lower income workers. Residents in Eastern regions and urban areas (especially the rural hukou holders living there) benefitted more from the environmental regulation.",
keywords = "Air pollution related health, Emissions trading, Environmental regulation, Sulfur dioxide pollution",
author = "Tor Eriksson and Yuze Wang and Nengshen Luo",
year = "2023",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101937",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
journal = "China Economic Review",
issn = "1043-951X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Health Impacts of Two Policies Regulating SO2 Air Pollution: Evidence from China

AU - Eriksson, Tor

AU - Wang, Yuze

AU - Luo, Nengshen

PY - 2023/4

Y1 - 2023/4

N2 - In developing countries widespread air pollution poses a major threat to public health calling for effective environmental regulation. This paper adds to the limited literature on the health impact of different environmental regulations. Using data from eight waves of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1993–2015), we employ a difference-in-differences model to investigate the health impact of two policies combatting SO 2 air pollution: the command-and-control environmental regulation represented by the Two Control Zones (TCZ) and the market-oriented environmental regulation represented by the SO 2 Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). The main findings are that the TCZ policy resulted in a 39% reduction in the 4-week prevalence of air pollution-related diseases through channels such as reducing industrial SO 2 emissions and industrial fumes emissions, and increasing individuals' amounts of physical exercise. In contrast, the ETS had no positive health effects, likely due to imperfect market mechanisms and environmental policy uncertainties. The health impact of the TCZ was most pronounced for respiratory illnesses, and was increasing over the period during which the policy was implemented. The positive health impact is stronger for outdoor, less educated, and lower income workers. Residents in Eastern regions and urban areas (especially the rural hukou holders living there) benefitted more from the environmental regulation.

AB - In developing countries widespread air pollution poses a major threat to public health calling for effective environmental regulation. This paper adds to the limited literature on the health impact of different environmental regulations. Using data from eight waves of the China Health and Nutrition Survey (1993–2015), we employ a difference-in-differences model to investigate the health impact of two policies combatting SO 2 air pollution: the command-and-control environmental regulation represented by the Two Control Zones (TCZ) and the market-oriented environmental regulation represented by the SO 2 Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS). The main findings are that the TCZ policy resulted in a 39% reduction in the 4-week prevalence of air pollution-related diseases through channels such as reducing industrial SO 2 emissions and industrial fumes emissions, and increasing individuals' amounts of physical exercise. In contrast, the ETS had no positive health effects, likely due to imperfect market mechanisms and environmental policy uncertainties. The health impact of the TCZ was most pronounced for respiratory illnesses, and was increasing over the period during which the policy was implemented. The positive health impact is stronger for outdoor, less educated, and lower income workers. Residents in Eastern regions and urban areas (especially the rural hukou holders living there) benefitted more from the environmental regulation.

KW - Air pollution related health

KW - Emissions trading

KW - Environmental regulation

KW - Sulfur dioxide pollution

U2 - 10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101937

DO - 10.1016/j.chieco.2023.101937

M3 - Journal article

VL - 78

JO - China Economic Review

JF - China Economic Review

SN - 1043-951X

M1 - 101937

ER -