Institut for Statskundskab

The European Parliament in the 2000 IGC and the Constitutional Treaty negotiations: from loser to winner.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Institut for Statskundskab
 

Abstract           Why did two rounds of EU constitutional reform held within a five year period yield very different results? The 2000 IGC resulted in the modest Treaty of Nice, whereas the 2002-04 round drafted the Constitutional Treaty, which although it did not involve major substantive changes, did mark a major symbolic step forward. This article argues that the change in outcomes can to a large degree be explained by the change in negotiating structure due to the use of a convention that drafted most of the Constitutional Treaty's text, creating a context which privileged MEPs. While the outer bounds of the possible were set by governments, the EP was able to build coalitions around ambitious yet realistic positions, leading to a final text that was a major symbolic step forward.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of European Public Policy
Vol/bind14
Nummer8
Sider (fra-til)1271-1292
Antal sider21
ISSN1350-1763
StatusUdgivet - 2007

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 8696991