The devil is in the detail: reconceptualising bystander reactions to online political hostility

Tanja Marie Hansen*, Lasse Lindekilde, Simon Tobias Schulz Karg

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

2 Citationer (Scopus)
4 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Online content moderation is often equated with platform-initiated take-downs and account suspensions. Counterspeech and other types of pro-social bystander behaviours present alternative approaches. They rely on the reactions of online bystanders to crowd-moderate hostile content. However, the current conceptual understanding of bystander reactions to hostility on social media is inadequate. What constitutes a reaction; what functions do specific reactions serve; and what audiences are reactions aimed at? Conceptual clarity is a prerequisite for studying the prevalence and consequences of pro-social bystander reactions. We therefore offer a novel unifying framework for conceptualising bystander reactions to online hostility: The Online Bystander Repertoire of Action (OBRA) Framework. This provides a foundation for future research on crowd-moderation, as it (1) combines insights across multiple research fields, (2) explicates the complex possible reactions beyond simplistic ‘reaction/no reaction´ distinctions and (3) draws attention to the degree of pro-sociality of bystander reactions–something that is often taken for granted.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBehaviour and Information Technology
Vol/bind43
Nummer14
Sider (fra-til)3523-3536
Antal sider14
ISSN0144-929X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2024

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'The devil is in the detail: reconceptualising bystander reactions to online political hostility'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater