Institut for Statskundskab

The Democratic Consequences of Anti-immigrant Political Rhetoric: A Mixed Methods Study of Immigrants’ Political Belonging

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

The Democratic Consequences of Anti-immigrant Political Rhetoric : A Mixed Methods Study of Immigrants’ Political Belonging. / Simonsen, Kristina Bakkær.

I: Political Behavior, Bind 43, Nr. 1, 03.2021, s. 143-174.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bibtex

@article{f26e5e392cbc49e9a63cd451930d0c15,
title = "The Democratic Consequences of Anti-immigrant Political Rhetoric: A Mixed Methods Study of Immigrants{\textquoteright} Political Belonging",
abstract = "Anti-immigrant political rhetoric is proliferating in Europe, inspiring research to examine the potential effects on public opinion. However, studies of the reactions of first- and second-generation immigrants—the objects of this rhetoric—remain scarce. This article argues that political rhetoric should be treated as a context of integration affecting political outcomes, in particular political belonging. To that end, the article combines qualitative evidence from focus group discussions conducted in Denmark, a high-salience context, and quantitative evidence from cross-national survey and party manifesto data from 18 Western European countries over a 12-year period. In addition to demonstrating a negative mean effect, the analyses show that those most in focus of contemporary political messages (Muslims and immigrants with shorter educations) are most affected, suggesting a sophisticated processing of political rhetoric. In contrast, traditional explanations concerning structural incorporation, generational integration, and exposure to rhetoric are not supported. The article discusses the implications of the results for democratic inclusion in contemporary Europe.",
keywords = "Immigrant integration, Mixed methods, Political belonging, Political incorporation, Political rhetoric",
author = "Simonsen, {Kristina Bakk{\ae}r}",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
doi = "10.1007/s11109-019-09549-6",
language = "English",
volume = "43",
pages = "143--174",
journal = "Political Behavior",
issn = "0190-9320",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Democratic Consequences of Anti-immigrant Political Rhetoric

T2 - A Mixed Methods Study of Immigrants’ Political Belonging

AU - Simonsen, Kristina Bakkær

PY - 2021/3

Y1 - 2021/3

N2 - Anti-immigrant political rhetoric is proliferating in Europe, inspiring research to examine the potential effects on public opinion. However, studies of the reactions of first- and second-generation immigrants—the objects of this rhetoric—remain scarce. This article argues that political rhetoric should be treated as a context of integration affecting political outcomes, in particular political belonging. To that end, the article combines qualitative evidence from focus group discussions conducted in Denmark, a high-salience context, and quantitative evidence from cross-national survey and party manifesto data from 18 Western European countries over a 12-year period. In addition to demonstrating a negative mean effect, the analyses show that those most in focus of contemporary political messages (Muslims and immigrants with shorter educations) are most affected, suggesting a sophisticated processing of political rhetoric. In contrast, traditional explanations concerning structural incorporation, generational integration, and exposure to rhetoric are not supported. The article discusses the implications of the results for democratic inclusion in contemporary Europe.

AB - Anti-immigrant political rhetoric is proliferating in Europe, inspiring research to examine the potential effects on public opinion. However, studies of the reactions of first- and second-generation immigrants—the objects of this rhetoric—remain scarce. This article argues that political rhetoric should be treated as a context of integration affecting political outcomes, in particular political belonging. To that end, the article combines qualitative evidence from focus group discussions conducted in Denmark, a high-salience context, and quantitative evidence from cross-national survey and party manifesto data from 18 Western European countries over a 12-year period. In addition to demonstrating a negative mean effect, the analyses show that those most in focus of contemporary political messages (Muslims and immigrants with shorter educations) are most affected, suggesting a sophisticated processing of political rhetoric. In contrast, traditional explanations concerning structural incorporation, generational integration, and exposure to rhetoric are not supported. The article discusses the implications of the results for democratic inclusion in contemporary Europe.

KW - Immigrant integration

KW - Mixed methods

KW - Political belonging

KW - Political incorporation

KW - Political rhetoric

U2 - 10.1007/s11109-019-09549-6

DO - 10.1007/s11109-019-09549-6

M3 - Journal article

VL - 43

SP - 143

EP - 174

JO - Political Behavior

JF - Political Behavior

SN - 0190-9320

IS - 1

ER -