Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of INTRAvascular Temperature Management versus Surface Cooling in COMATose Patients Resuscitated from Cardiac Arrest

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisReviewForskningpeer review

Standard

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of INTRAvascular Temperature Management versus Surface Cooling in COMATose Patients Resuscitated from Cardiac Arrest. / Bartlett, Emily; Valenzuela, Terence; Idris, Ahamed; Deye, Nicolas; Glover, Guy; Gillies, Michael; Taccone, Fabio Silvio; Sunde, Kjetil; Flint, Alexander; Thiele, Holger; Arrich, Jasmin; Hemphill, Claude; Holzer, Michael; Skrifvars, Markus B; Pittl, Undine; Polderman, Kees; Ong, Marcus Eh; Kim, Ki Hong; Oh, Sang Hoon; Shin, Sang; Kirkegaard, Hans; Nichol, Graham.

I: Resuscitation, Bind 146, 01.2020, s. 82-95.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisReviewForskningpeer review

Harvard

Bartlett, E, Valenzuela, T, Idris, A, Deye, N, Glover, G, Gillies, M, Taccone, FS, Sunde, K, Flint, A, Thiele, H, Arrich, J, Hemphill, C, Holzer, M, Skrifvars, MB, Pittl, U, Polderman, K, Ong, ME, Kim, KH, Oh, SH, Shin, S, Kirkegaard, H & Nichol, G 2020, 'Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of INTRAvascular Temperature Management versus Surface Cooling in COMATose Patients Resuscitated from Cardiac Arrest', Resuscitation, bind 146, s. 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.035

APA

Bartlett, E., Valenzuela, T., Idris, A., Deye, N., Glover, G., Gillies, M., Taccone, F. S., Sunde, K., Flint, A., Thiele, H., Arrich, J., Hemphill, C., Holzer, M., Skrifvars, M. B., Pittl, U., Polderman, K., Ong, M. E., Kim, K. H., Oh, S. H., ... Nichol, G. (2020). Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of INTRAvascular Temperature Management versus Surface Cooling in COMATose Patients Resuscitated from Cardiac Arrest. Resuscitation, 146, 82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.035

CBE

Bartlett E, Valenzuela T, Idris A, Deye N, Glover G, Gillies M, Taccone FS, Sunde K, Flint A, Thiele H, Arrich J, Hemphill C, Holzer M, Skrifvars MB, Pittl U, Polderman K, Ong ME, Kim KH, Oh SH, Shin S, Kirkegaard H, Nichol G. 2020. Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of INTRAvascular Temperature Management versus Surface Cooling in COMATose Patients Resuscitated from Cardiac Arrest. Resuscitation. 146:82-95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.035

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Bartlett, Emily ; Valenzuela, Terence ; Idris, Ahamed ; Deye, Nicolas ; Glover, Guy ; Gillies, Michael ; Taccone, Fabio Silvio ; Sunde, Kjetil ; Flint, Alexander ; Thiele, Holger ; Arrich, Jasmin ; Hemphill, Claude ; Holzer, Michael ; Skrifvars, Markus B ; Pittl, Undine ; Polderman, Kees ; Ong, Marcus Eh ; Kim, Ki Hong ; Oh, Sang Hoon ; Shin, Sang ; Kirkegaard, Hans ; Nichol, Graham. / Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of INTRAvascular Temperature Management versus Surface Cooling in COMATose Patients Resuscitated from Cardiac Arrest. I: Resuscitation. 2020 ; Bind 146. s. 82-95.

Bibtex

@article{ae03f11818e042749bc39f483448795e,
title = "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of INTRAvascular Temperature Management versus Surface Cooling in COMATose Patients Resuscitated from Cardiac Arrest",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of intravascular temperature management (IVTM) versus surface cooling methods (SCM) for induced hypothermia (IH).METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. English-language PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched on May 27, 2019. The quality of included observational studies was graded using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool. The quality of included randomized trials was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Random effects modeling was used to calculate risk differences for each outcome. Statistical heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using standard methods.ELIGIBILITY: Observational or randomized studies comparing survival and/or neurologic outcomes in adults aged 18 years or greater resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receiving IH via IVTM versus SCM were eligible for inclusion.RESULTS: In total, 12 studies met inclusion criteria. These enrolled 1,573 patients who received IVTM; and 4,008 who received SCM. Survival was 55.0% in the IVTM group and 51.2% in the SCM group [pooled risk difference 2% (95% CI -1%, 5%)]. Good neurological outcome was achieved in 40.9% in the IVTM and 29.5% in the surface group [pooled risk difference 5% (95% CI 2%, 8%)]. There was a 6% (95% CI 11%, 2%) lower risk of arrhythmia with use of IVTM and 15% (95% CI 22%, 7%) decreased risk of overcooling with use of IVTM versus SCM. There was no significant difference in other evaluated adverse events between groups.CONCLUSIONS: IVTM was associated with improved neurological outcomes vs. SCM among survivors resuscitated following cardiac arrest. These results may have implications for care of patients in the emergency department and intensive care settings after resuscitation from cardiac arrest.",
keywords = "Cardiac arrest, Induced hypothermia, Intravascular temperature management, Surface cooling methods, Targeted temperature management",
author = "Emily Bartlett and Terence Valenzuela and Ahamed Idris and Nicolas Deye and Guy Glover and Michael Gillies and Taccone, {Fabio Silvio} and Kjetil Sunde and Alexander Flint and Holger Thiele and Jasmin Arrich and Claude Hemphill and Michael Holzer and Skrifvars, {Markus B} and Undine Pittl and Kees Polderman and Ong, {Marcus Eh} and Kim, {Ki Hong} and Oh, {Sang Hoon} and Sang Shin and Hans Kirkegaard and Graham Nichol",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2020",
month = jan,
doi = "10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.035",
language = "English",
volume = "146",
pages = "82--95",
journal = "Resuscitation",
issn = "0300-9572",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd.",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of INTRAvascular Temperature Management versus Surface Cooling in COMATose Patients Resuscitated from Cardiac Arrest

AU - Bartlett, Emily

AU - Valenzuela, Terence

AU - Idris, Ahamed

AU - Deye, Nicolas

AU - Glover, Guy

AU - Gillies, Michael

AU - Taccone, Fabio Silvio

AU - Sunde, Kjetil

AU - Flint, Alexander

AU - Thiele, Holger

AU - Arrich, Jasmin

AU - Hemphill, Claude

AU - Holzer, Michael

AU - Skrifvars, Markus B

AU - Pittl, Undine

AU - Polderman, Kees

AU - Ong, Marcus Eh

AU - Kim, Ki Hong

AU - Oh, Sang Hoon

AU - Shin, Sang

AU - Kirkegaard, Hans

AU - Nichol, Graham

N1 - Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of intravascular temperature management (IVTM) versus surface cooling methods (SCM) for induced hypothermia (IH).METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. English-language PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched on May 27, 2019. The quality of included observational studies was graded using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool. The quality of included randomized trials was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Random effects modeling was used to calculate risk differences for each outcome. Statistical heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using standard methods.ELIGIBILITY: Observational or randomized studies comparing survival and/or neurologic outcomes in adults aged 18 years or greater resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receiving IH via IVTM versus SCM were eligible for inclusion.RESULTS: In total, 12 studies met inclusion criteria. These enrolled 1,573 patients who received IVTM; and 4,008 who received SCM. Survival was 55.0% in the IVTM group and 51.2% in the SCM group [pooled risk difference 2% (95% CI -1%, 5%)]. Good neurological outcome was achieved in 40.9% in the IVTM and 29.5% in the surface group [pooled risk difference 5% (95% CI 2%, 8%)]. There was a 6% (95% CI 11%, 2%) lower risk of arrhythmia with use of IVTM and 15% (95% CI 22%, 7%) decreased risk of overcooling with use of IVTM versus SCM. There was no significant difference in other evaluated adverse events between groups.CONCLUSIONS: IVTM was associated with improved neurological outcomes vs. SCM among survivors resuscitated following cardiac arrest. These results may have implications for care of patients in the emergency department and intensive care settings after resuscitation from cardiac arrest.

AB - OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of intravascular temperature management (IVTM) versus surface cooling methods (SCM) for induced hypothermia (IH).METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis. English-language PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched on May 27, 2019. The quality of included observational studies was graded using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment tool. The quality of included randomized trials was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's risk of bias tool. Random effects modeling was used to calculate risk differences for each outcome. Statistical heterogeneity and publication bias were assessed using standard methods.ELIGIBILITY: Observational or randomized studies comparing survival and/or neurologic outcomes in adults aged 18 years or greater resuscitated from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest receiving IH via IVTM versus SCM were eligible for inclusion.RESULTS: In total, 12 studies met inclusion criteria. These enrolled 1,573 patients who received IVTM; and 4,008 who received SCM. Survival was 55.0% in the IVTM group and 51.2% in the SCM group [pooled risk difference 2% (95% CI -1%, 5%)]. Good neurological outcome was achieved in 40.9% in the IVTM and 29.5% in the surface group [pooled risk difference 5% (95% CI 2%, 8%)]. There was a 6% (95% CI 11%, 2%) lower risk of arrhythmia with use of IVTM and 15% (95% CI 22%, 7%) decreased risk of overcooling with use of IVTM versus SCM. There was no significant difference in other evaluated adverse events between groups.CONCLUSIONS: IVTM was associated with improved neurological outcomes vs. SCM among survivors resuscitated following cardiac arrest. These results may have implications for care of patients in the emergency department and intensive care settings after resuscitation from cardiac arrest.

KW - Cardiac arrest

KW - Induced hypothermia

KW - Intravascular temperature management

KW - Surface cooling methods

KW - Targeted temperature management

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075797512&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.035

DO - 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2019.10.035

M3 - Review

C2 - 31730898

VL - 146

SP - 82

EP - 95

JO - Resuscitation

JF - Resuscitation

SN - 0300-9572

ER -