TY - JOUR
T1 - Stroke-Specific Quality of life one-year post-stroke in two Scandinavian country-regions with different organisation of rehabilitation services
T2 - a prospective study
AU - Pedersen, Synne Garder
AU - Friborg, Oddgeir
AU - Heiberg, Guri Anita
AU - Arntzen, Cathrine
AU - Stabel, Henriette Holm
AU - Thrane, Gyrd
AU - Nielsen, Jørgen Feldbæk
AU - Anke, Audny
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Purpose: To compare stroke-specific health related quality of life in two country-regions with organisational differences in subacute rehabilitation services, and to reveal whether organisational factors or individual factors impact outcome. Materials and methods: A prospective multicentre study with one-year follow-up of 369 first-ever stroke survivors with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, recruited from stroke units in North Norway (n = 208) and Central Denmark (n = 161). The 12-domain Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale was the primary outcome-measure. Results: The Norwegian participants were older than the Danish (M age= 69.8 vs. 66.7 years, respectively), had higher initial stroke severity, and longer stroke unit stays. Both cohorts reported more problems with cognitive, social, and emotional functioning compared to physical functioning. Two scale components were revealed. Between-country differences in the cognitive-social-mental component showed slightly better function in the Norwegian participants. Depression, anxiety, pre-stroke dependency, initial stroke severity, and older age were substantially associated to scale scores. Conclusions: Successful improvements in one-year functioning in both country-regions may result from optimising long-term rehabilitation services to address cognitive, emotional, and social functioning. Stroke-Specific Quality of Life one-year post-stroke could be explained by individual factors, such as pre-stroke dependency and mental health, rather than differences in the organisation of subacute rehabilitation services.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION The stroke-specific health related quality of life (SS-QOL) assessment tool captures multidimensional effects of a stroke from the perspective of the patient, which is clinically important information for the rehabilitation services. The cognitive-social-mental component and the physical health component, indicate specific functional problems which may vary across and within countries and regions with different organisation of rehabilitation services. For persons with mild to moderate stroke, longer-term functional improvements may be better optimised if the rehabilitation services particularly address cognitive, emotional, and social functioning.
AB - Purpose: To compare stroke-specific health related quality of life in two country-regions with organisational differences in subacute rehabilitation services, and to reveal whether organisational factors or individual factors impact outcome. Materials and methods: A prospective multicentre study with one-year follow-up of 369 first-ever stroke survivors with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, recruited from stroke units in North Norway (n = 208) and Central Denmark (n = 161). The 12-domain Stroke-Specific Quality of Life scale was the primary outcome-measure. Results: The Norwegian participants were older than the Danish (M age= 69.8 vs. 66.7 years, respectively), had higher initial stroke severity, and longer stroke unit stays. Both cohorts reported more problems with cognitive, social, and emotional functioning compared to physical functioning. Two scale components were revealed. Between-country differences in the cognitive-social-mental component showed slightly better function in the Norwegian participants. Depression, anxiety, pre-stroke dependency, initial stroke severity, and older age were substantially associated to scale scores. Conclusions: Successful improvements in one-year functioning in both country-regions may result from optimising long-term rehabilitation services to address cognitive, emotional, and social functioning. Stroke-Specific Quality of Life one-year post-stroke could be explained by individual factors, such as pre-stroke dependency and mental health, rather than differences in the organisation of subacute rehabilitation services.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION The stroke-specific health related quality of life (SS-QOL) assessment tool captures multidimensional effects of a stroke from the perspective of the patient, which is clinically important information for the rehabilitation services. The cognitive-social-mental component and the physical health component, indicate specific functional problems which may vary across and within countries and regions with different organisation of rehabilitation services. For persons with mild to moderate stroke, longer-term functional improvements may be better optimised if the rehabilitation services particularly address cognitive, emotional, and social functioning.
KW - Stroke
KW - Stroke-Specific Quality of Life (SS-QOL) scale
KW - countries
KW - health-related quality of life (HRQOL)
KW - rehabilitation services
KW - DEPRESSION
KW - INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION
KW - DETERMINANTS
KW - GUIDELINES
KW - HOSPITAL ANXIETY
KW - CARE
KW - RECOVERY
KW - IMPACT
KW - PREDICTORS
KW - SCALE
KW - Prospective Studies
KW - Humans
KW - Survivors
KW - Stroke Rehabilitation
KW - Quality of Life
KW - Aged
U2 - 10.1080/09638288.2020.1753830
DO - 10.1080/09638288.2020.1753830
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32356473
SN - 0963-8288
VL - 43
SP - 3810
EP - 3820
JO - Disability and Rehabilitation
JF - Disability and Rehabilitation
IS - 26
ER -