State First? A Disaggregation and Empirical Interrogation

David Andersen*, Jonathan Stavnskær Doucette

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisLetterpeer review

11 Citationer (Scopus)
114 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This letter is the first to systematically scrutinize the multifaceted claim that a strong state promotes democratic development. It analyzes new Varieties of Democracy data from 1789 to 2015 to specify and examine eight different versions of this 'state-first' argument in analyses that span the entire era of modern democracy. The authors document that high levels of bureaucratic quality at the time of the first democratic transition and during democratic spells are positively associated with democratic survival and deepening. By contrast, state capacity has no robust effects on democratic survival or deepening and does not condition the impact of bureaucratic quality. These findings underline the importance of particular features of a strong state as well as the importance of a disaggregated approach. They imply that democratic development is better aided by strengthening the impartiality of bureaucratic organizations than by building capacity for territorial control.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftBritish Journal of Political Science
Vol/bind52
Nummer1
Sider (fra-til)408-415
Antal sider8
ISSN0007-1234
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2022

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'State First? A Disaggregation and Empirical Interrogation'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater