Institut for Statskundskab

Socioeconomic status and risk of osteoporotic fractures and the use of DXA scans: data from the Danish population-based ROSE study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  • Theresa Friis-Holmberg, University of Southern Denmark,
  • S Möller, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • ,
  • Mette Juel Rothmann, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark., University of Southern Denmark,
  • J Gram, University of Southern Denmark, Hospital of Southwest Denmark
  • ,
  • A P Herman, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark., University of Southern Denmark,
  • K Brixen, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.
  • ,
  • J S Tolstrup, University of Southern Denmark,
  • M Høiberg, University of Southern Denmark, Hospital of Southern Norway
  • ,
  • Mickael Bech
  • K H Rubin, University of Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

Summary: There is a need of studies exploring the link between socioeconomic status and DXA scans and osteoporotic fracture, which was the aim of the present study. No differences in socioeconomic status and risk of osteoporotic fractures were found. However, women with further/higher education and higher income are more often DXA-scanned. Introduction: Lower socioeconomic status is known to be associated with a range of chronic conditions and with access to health care services. The link between socioeconomic status and the use of DXA scans and osteoporotic fracture, however, needs to be explored more closely. Therefore, the aim of this study was to examine the relationship between socioeconomic status and both DXA scan utilization and major osteoporotic fractures (MOF) using a population-based cohort of Danish women and national registers. Methods: The study included 17,155 women (65–81 years) sampled from the Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation study (ROSE). Information on socioeconomic background, DXA scans, and MOFs was retrieved from national registers. Competing-risk regression analyses were performed. Mean follow-up was 4.8 years. Results: A total of 4245 women had a DXA scan (24.7%) and 1719 (10.0%) had an incident MOF during follow-up. Analyses showed that women with basic education had a lower probability of undergoing DXA scans than women with further or higher education (greater than upper secondary education and vocational training education) (subhazard ratio (SHR) = 0.82; 95% CI 0.75–0.89, adjusted for age and comorbidity). Moreover, women with disposable income in the low and medium tertiles had a lower probability of undergoing DXA scans than women in the high-income tertile (SHR = 0.90; 95% CI 0.84–0.97 and SHR = 0.88, 95% CI 0.82–0.95, respectively, adjusted for age and comorbidity). No association between socioeconomic background and probability of DXA was found in adjusted analyses. Conclusion: The study found no differences in risk of osteoporotic fractures depending on socioeconomic status. However, women with further or higher education as well as higher income are more often DXA-scanned.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftOsteoporosis International
Vol/bind30
Nummer2
Sider (fra-til)343-353
Antal sider11
ISSN0937-941X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - feb. 2019

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 137122338