Short and Sweet: Measuring Experiences of Administrative Burden

Sebastian Jilke*, Martin Bækgaard, Pamela Herd, Donald Moynihan

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

Emerging research on administrative burden has highlighted the need for survey measures that capture people’s experience of government as onerous. Such indicators can connect research and practice, and fulfill government mandates to identify and reduce burdens. This study presents a measure of experienced administrative burden, based on a survey of social welfare users. Using psychometric scale development techniques and a split sample approach, we develop both a single-item and three-item scale that can be applied in user surveys for both research and practitioner purposes. We use predictive validity tests to assess both measures, finding that people are more likely to report burden when they have poorer health, lower education,
experience short-term financial scarcity, are younger and have less program-specific experience. We also provide evidence to demonstrate how the measure captures burden distinct from the customer experience indicators used by the US federal government, while also being shorter and thus less burdensome for respondents.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Behavioral Public Administration
Vol/bind7
Sider (fra-til)1-12
ISSN2576-6465
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2024

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Short and Sweet: Measuring Experiences of Administrative Burden'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater