Sex, drugs, and how to deal with criticism: the case of Flibanserin

Anke Bueter, Saana Jukola

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/proceedingBidrag til bog/antologiForskningpeer review

11 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

In 2015, the US Food and Drug Administration made the controversial decision to approve flibanserin as the first drug against problems of low female sexual desire. This approval has encountered many criticisms; in particular, it has been condemned as an exemplary instance of medicalization and disease-mongering, as lacking sufficient evidential support, and as targeting a highly problematic diagnosis (Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder). In this paper, we review these complaints and show that many of the issues in the flibanserin case stem from a failure to properly deal with criticism. We argue that a principle of uptake of criticism can help preventing bias in research and drug regulation and can be secured by institutional measures.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelBoston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science : epistemology, methods and decisions
RedaktørerAdam LaCaze, Barbara Osimani
Antal sider20
UdgivelsesstedCham
ForlagSpringer
Publikationsdato2020
Sider451-470
ISBN (Trykt)978-3-030-29178-5
ISBN (Elektronisk)978-3-030-29179-2
StatusUdgivet - 2020
NavnBoston Studies in the Philosophy and History of Science
Vol/bind338
ISSN0068-0346

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Sex, drugs, and how to deal with criticism: the case of Flibanserin'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater