Screening for somatization and hypochondriasis in primary care and neurological in-patients: A seven-item scale for hypochondriasis and somatization

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Per Fink
  • Henrik Ewald, Department of Psychiatric Demography
  • ,
  • Jørgen Jensen
  • Lisbeth Sørensen, Department of Psychiatric Demography
  • ,
  • Marianne Engberg, Department of Psychiatric Demography
  • ,
  • Martin Holm, P.
  • ,
  • Povl Munk-Jørgensen, Department of Psychiatric Demography

The aim of this study was to investigate the internal and external validity of the Whiteley Index as a screening instrument for somatization illness. A 14-item version of the Whiteley Index for hypochondriacal traits was given to 99 of 191 consecutive primary care patients, aged 18-65 years, and to 100 consecutive patients, aged 18-60 years, admitted for the first time to a neurological ward. The primary care sample was, in addition, interviewed by means of the SCAN (Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry) psychiatric interview. The GPs and the neurologists were asked to rate various characteristics of the patients that might indicate somatization. The internal validity of the Whiteley Index was tested by means of latent structure analysis. On this basis, a reduced seven-item scale (Whiteley-7 scale) and two subscales (i.e., an Illness Conviction and Illness Worrying scale, each with three items) were constructed. All three had a high internal validity fitting into the very restricted Rasch statistical model (p>0.05) and an acceptable transferability between most of the subpopulations investigated. In the primary care population, the Whiteley-7 and the Illness Conviction scales at cut-point 0/1 showed 1.00 and 0.87 sensitivity and 0.65 and 0.87 specificity, respectively, using as 'gold standard' the fulfillment of criteria for at least one ICD-10 somatoform disorder, and 0.71 and 0.63 sensitivity and 0.62 and 0.87 specificity, respectively, as gold standard for the fulfillment of criteria for at least one DSM-IV somatoform disorder, excluding the NOS diagnostic group. The Illness Worrying subscale showed less impressive performance in this respect. The agreement between the Whiteley-7 scale including the two subscales and neurologists' rating and the GPs' rating and the somatization subscale on the SCL-90 was modest or worse. It may be concluded that the Whiteley-7 scale and the Illness Conviction subscale had acceptable psychometric profiles, and both seem to be promising screening tools for not only hypochondriasis but also for somatoform disorders in general.

TidsskriftJournal of Psychosomatic Research
Sider (fra-til)261-273
Antal sider13
StatusUdgivet - mar. 1999

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 231100460

Her finder du Funktionelle Lidelser

Funktionelle Lidelser
Aarhus Universitetshospital
Universitetsbyen 21 og 23, 1 sal
8000 Aarhus C

Find os på kortet

Tlf.: +45 78 46 43 10
Fax: +45 78 46 43 40



Mandag til torsdag kl. 8.00–14.00
Fredag kl. 8.00–13.00


Mandag til torsdag kl. 8.00–15.00
Fredag kl. 8.00–14.00

3826 / i30