Aarhus Universitets segl

English

Du er her: AU » Om AU » Organisation » Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measu...

Om AU

Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Foot and Mouth Disease

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Standard

Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Foot and Mouth Disease. / EFSA Panel Anim Hlth Welf; Nielsen, Soren Saxmose; Alvarez, Julio et al.
I: EFSA Journal, Bind 19, Nr. 6, e06632, 06.2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Harvard

EFSA Panel Anim Hlth Welf, Nielsen, SS, Alvarez, J, Bicout, DJ, Calistri, P, Canali, E, Drewe, JA, Garin-Bastuji, B, Gonzales Rojas, JL, Gortazar Schmidt, C, Herskin, M, Michel, V, Miranda Chueca, MA, Padalino, B, Pasquali, P, Sihvonen, LH, Spoolder, H, Stahl, K, Velarde, A, Viltrop, A, Winckler, C, De Clercq, K, Gubbins, S, Klement, E, Stegeman, JA, Antoniou, S-E, Aznar, I, Broglia, A, Papanikolaou, A, Van der Stede, Y, Zancanaro, G & Roberts, HC 2021, 'Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Foot and Mouth Disease', EFSA Journal, bind 19, nr. 6, e06632. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6632

APA

EFSA Panel Anim Hlth Welf, Nielsen, S. S., Alvarez, J., Bicout, D. J., Calistri, P., Canali, E., Drewe, J. A., Garin-Bastuji, B., Gonzales Rojas, J. L., Gortazar Schmidt, C., Herskin, M., Michel, V., Miranda Chueca, M. A., Padalino, B., Pasquali, P., Sihvonen, L. H., Spoolder, H., Stahl, K., Velarde, A., ... Roberts, H. C. (2021). Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Foot and Mouth Disease. EFSA Journal, 19(6), artikel e06632. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6632

CBE

EFSA Panel Anim Hlth Welf, Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E, Drewe JA, Garin-Bastuji B, Gonzales Rojas JL, Gortazar Schmidt C, et al. 2021. Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Foot and Mouth Disease. EFSA Journal. 19(6):Article e06632. https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6632

MLA

EFSA Panel Anim Hlth Welf et al. "Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Foot and Mouth Disease". EFSA Journal. 2021. 19(6). https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6632

Vancouver

EFSA Panel Anim Hlth Welf, Nielsen SS, Alvarez J, Bicout DJ, Calistri P, Canali E et al. Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Foot and Mouth Disease. EFSA Journal. 2021 jun.;19(6):e06632. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6632

Author

EFSA Panel Anim Hlth Welf ; Nielsen, Soren Saxmose ; Alvarez, Julio et al. / Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law : Foot and Mouth Disease. I: EFSA Journal. 2021 ; Bind 19, Nr. 6.

Bibtex

@article{9d47d86d7f244802bcc726d11d652483,
title = "Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law: Foot and Mouth Disease",
abstract = "EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for foot and mouth disease (FMD). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, ii) monitoring period and iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection zone of 3 km and of the surveillance zone of 10 km are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective, and it was concluded that the protection and the surveillance zones comprise > 99% of the infections from an affected establishment if transmission occurred. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to FMD. (C) 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.",
keywords = "Foot and mouth disease, FMD, foot and mouth diseases virus, FMDV, disease control measures, sampling procedures, monitoring period, protection zone, surveillance zone, PHASE COMPETITION ELISA, REAL-TIME, LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS, EMERGENCY VACCINATION, VIRUS-INFECTION, GREAT-BRITAIN, 2001 EPIDEMIC, TRANSMISSION, CATTLE, ANTIBODY",
author = "{EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)} and Nielsen, {Soren Saxmose} and Julio Alvarez and Bicout, {Dominique Joseph} and Paolo Calistri and Elisabetta Canali and Drewe, {Julian Ashley} and Bruno Garin-Bastuji and {Gonzales Rojas}, {Jose Luis} and {Gortazar Schmidt}, Christian and Mette Herskin and Virginie Michel and {Miranda Chueca}, {Miguel Angel} and Barbara Padalino and Paolo Pasquali and Sihvonen, {Liisa Helena} and Hans Spoolder and Karl Stahl and Antonio Velarde and Arvo Viltrop and Christoph Winckler and {De Clercq}, Kris and Simon Gubbins and Eyal Klement and Stegeman, {Jan Arend} and Sotiria-Eleni Antoniou and Inma Aznar and Alessandro Broglia and Alexandra Papanikolaou and {Van der Stede}, Yves and Gabriele Zancanaro and Roberts, {Helen Clare}",
year = "2021",
month = jun,
doi = "10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6632",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
journal = "EFSA Journal",
issn = "1831-4732",
publisher = "European Food Safety Authority - efsa",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Scientific Opinion on the assessment of the control measures for category A diseases of Animal Health Law

T2 - Foot and Mouth Disease

AU - EFSA Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW)

AU - Nielsen, Soren Saxmose

AU - Alvarez, Julio

AU - Bicout, Dominique Joseph

AU - Calistri, Paolo

AU - Canali, Elisabetta

AU - Drewe, Julian Ashley

AU - Garin-Bastuji, Bruno

AU - Gonzales Rojas, Jose Luis

AU - Gortazar Schmidt, Christian

AU - Herskin, Mette

AU - Michel, Virginie

AU - Miranda Chueca, Miguel Angel

AU - Padalino, Barbara

AU - Pasquali, Paolo

AU - Sihvonen, Liisa Helena

AU - Spoolder, Hans

AU - Stahl, Karl

AU - Velarde, Antonio

AU - Viltrop, Arvo

AU - Winckler, Christoph

AU - De Clercq, Kris

AU - Gubbins, Simon

AU - Klement, Eyal

AU - Stegeman, Jan Arend

AU - Antoniou, Sotiria-Eleni

AU - Aznar, Inma

AU - Broglia, Alessandro

AU - Papanikolaou, Alexandra

AU - Van der Stede, Yves

AU - Zancanaro, Gabriele

AU - Roberts, Helen Clare

PY - 2021/6

Y1 - 2021/6

N2 - EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for foot and mouth disease (FMD). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, ii) monitoring period and iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection zone of 3 km and of the surveillance zone of 10 km are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective, and it was concluded that the protection and the surveillance zones comprise > 99% of the infections from an affected establishment if transmission occurred. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to FMD. (C) 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

AB - EFSA received a mandate from the European Commission to assess the effectiveness of some of the control measures against diseases included in the Category A list according to Regulation (EU) 2016/429 on transmissible animal diseases ('Animal Health Law'). This opinion belongs to a series of opinions where these control measures will be assessed, with this opinion covering the assessment of control measures for foot and mouth disease (FMD). In this opinion, EFSA and the AHAW Panel of experts review the effectiveness of: i) clinical and laboratory sampling procedures, ii) monitoring period and iii) the minimum radius of the protection and surveillance zones, and the minimum length of time the measures should be applied in these zones. The general methodology used for this series of opinions has been published elsewhere; nonetheless, the transmission kernels used for the assessment of the minimum radius of the protection zone of 3 km and of the surveillance zone of 10 km are shown. Several scenarios for which these control measures had to be assessed were designed and agreed prior to the start of the assessment. The monitoring period of 21 days was assessed as effective, and it was concluded that the protection and the surveillance zones comprise > 99% of the infections from an affected establishment if transmission occurred. Recommendations, provided for each of the scenarios assessed, aim to support the European Commission in the drafting of further pieces of legislation, as well as for plausible ad hoc requests in relation to FMD. (C) 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.

KW - Foot and mouth disease

KW - FMD

KW - foot and mouth diseases virus

KW - FMDV

KW - disease control measures

KW - sampling procedures

KW - monitoring period

KW - protection zone

KW - surveillance zone

KW - PHASE COMPETITION ELISA

KW - REAL-TIME

KW - LABORATORY INVESTIGATIONS

KW - EMERGENCY VACCINATION

KW - VIRUS-INFECTION

KW - GREAT-BRITAIN

KW - 2001 EPIDEMIC

KW - TRANSMISSION

KW - CATTLE

KW - ANTIBODY

U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6632

DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6632

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34136003

VL - 19

JO - EFSA Journal

JF - EFSA Journal

SN - 1831-4732

IS - 6

M1 - e06632

ER -