Research Governance and the Dynamics of Science: A Framework for the Study of Governance Effects on Research Fields

TY - JOUR

T1 - Research Governance and the Dynamics of Science:

T2 - A Framework for the Study of Governance Effects on Research Fields

AU - Nedeva, Maria

AU - Tirado, Mayra M.

AU - Thomas, Duncan Andrew

PY - 2023/1

Y1 - 2023/1

N2 - This article offers a framework for the study of research governance effects on scientific fields framed by notions of research quality and the epistemic, organizational, and career choices they entail. The framework interprets the contested idea of 'quality' as an interplay involving notion origins, quality attributes, and contextual sites. We mobilize the origin and site components, to frame organizational-level events where quality notions inform selections, or selection events. Through the dynamic interplay between notions selected at specific sites, we contend, local actors enact research quality cumulatively, by making choices that privilege certain notions over others. In this article, we contribute in four ways. First, we propose an approach to study research governance effects on scientific fields. Second, we introduce first-and second-level effects of research governance paving the way to identify mechanisms through which these different levels of effects occur. Third, we assert that interactions between research spaces and fields leading to effects occur in the context of research organizations, and at nine key selection events. Fourth, and lastly, we discuss an empirical test on an illustration case to demonstrate how this approach can be applied.

AB - This article offers a framework for the study of research governance effects on scientific fields framed by notions of research quality and the epistemic, organizational, and career choices they entail. The framework interprets the contested idea of 'quality' as an interplay involving notion origins, quality attributes, and contextual sites. We mobilize the origin and site components, to frame organizational-level events where quality notions inform selections, or selection events. Through the dynamic interplay between notions selected at specific sites, we contend, local actors enact research quality cumulatively, by making choices that privilege certain notions over others. In this article, we contribute in four ways. First, we propose an approach to study research governance effects on scientific fields. Second, we introduce first-and second-level effects of research governance paving the way to identify mechanisms through which these different levels of effects occur. Third, we assert that interactions between research spaces and fields leading to effects occur in the context of research organizations, and at nine key selection events. Fourth, and lastly, we discuss an empirical test on an illustration case to demonstrate how this approach can be applied.

KW - CERN particle physics

KW - UK Research Excellence Framework

KW - research governance effects

KW - science dynamics

KW - scientific fields

U2 - 10.1093/reseval/rvac028

DO - 10.1093/reseval/rvac028

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0958-2029

VL - 32

SP - 116

EP - 127

JO - Research Evaluation

JF - Research Evaluation

IS - 1

ER -