Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
Reporting the discovery of new chemical elements : Working in different worlds, only 25 years apart. / Wray, K. Brad; Andersen, Line Edslev.
I: Foundations of Chemistry: Philosophical, Historical, Educational and Interdisciplinary Studies of Chemistry, Bind 22, Nr. 2, 07.2020, s. 137-146.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reporting the discovery of new chemical elements
T2 - Working in different worlds, only 25 years apart
AU - Wray, K. Brad
AU - Andersen, Line Edslev
PY - 2020/7
Y1 - 2020/7
N2 - In his account of scientific revolutions, Thomas Kuhn suggests that after a revolutionary change of theory, it is as if scientists are working in a different world. In this paper, we aim to show that the notion of world change is insightful. We contrast the reporting of the discovery of neon in 1898 with the discovery of hafnium in 1923. The one discovery was made when elements were identified by their atomic weight; the other discovery was made after scientists came to classify elements by their atomic number. By considering two instances of the reporting of the discovery of a new chemical element 25 years apart, we argue that it becomes clear how chemists can be said to have been responding to different worlds as a result of the change in the concept of a chemical element. They (i) saw, (ii) did, and (iii) reported different things as they conducted their research on the new chemical elements.
AB - In his account of scientific revolutions, Thomas Kuhn suggests that after a revolutionary change of theory, it is as if scientists are working in a different world. In this paper, we aim to show that the notion of world change is insightful. We contrast the reporting of the discovery of neon in 1898 with the discovery of hafnium in 1923. The one discovery was made when elements were identified by their atomic weight; the other discovery was made after scientists came to classify elements by their atomic number. By considering two instances of the reporting of the discovery of a new chemical element 25 years apart, we argue that it becomes clear how chemists can be said to have been responding to different worlds as a result of the change in the concept of a chemical element. They (i) saw, (ii) did, and (iii) reported different things as they conducted their research on the new chemical elements.
KW - chemical element
KW - discovery
KW - Thomas Kuhn
KW - neon
KW - hafnium
KW - world changes
KW - theory change
U2 - 10.1007/s10698-019-09348-1
DO - 10.1007/s10698-019-09348-1
M3 - Journal article
VL - 22
SP - 137
EP - 146
JO - Foundations of Chemistry: Philosophical, Historical, Educational and Interdisciplinary Studies of Chemistry
JF - Foundations of Chemistry: Philosophical, Historical, Educational and Interdisciplinary Studies of Chemistry
SN - 1386-4238
IS - 2
ER -