Relational Egalitarianism, Paternalism, Adults and Children: A Puzzle

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

2 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Relational egalitarianism is a theory of justice according to which people must relate as equals. However, not just any inegalitarian relation is unjust, i.e., the fact that parents do not relate as equals to their children is not unjust. Whereas an adult treating another adult paternalistically is objectionable from the point of view of relational egalitarianism, parent-child paternalism is not. What may explain this difference in judgment? I refer to this as the Puzzle. I discuss four justifications of the Puzzle and argue that none of them is satisfactory. In the final part of the paper, I discuss where this leaves relational egalitarianism as a theory of justice.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer11
TidsskriftErgo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy
Vol/bind2022
Nummer9
Sider (fra-til)309-328
Antal sider20
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Relational Egalitarianism, Paternalism, Adults and Children: A Puzzle'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater