Dansk Center for Forskningsanalyse

Ranking national research systems by citation indicators: A comparative analysis using whole and fractionalised counting methods

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Dag W. Aksnes, NIFU – Nordic Institute for Studies in Innovation, Research and Education, Norge
  • Jesper Wiborg Schneider
  • Magnus Gunnarsson, Swedish Research Council – Department of Research Policy Analysis, Sverige
This paper presents an empirical analysis of two different methodologies for calculating national citation indicators: whole counts and fractionalised counts. The aim of our study is to investigate the effect on relative citation indicators when citations to documents are fractionalised among the authoring countries. We have performed two analyses: a time series analysis of one country and a cross-sectional analysis of 23 countries. The results show that all countries’ relative citation indicators are lower when fractionalised counting is used. Further, the difference between whole and fractionalised counts is generally greatest for the countries with the highest proportion of internationally co-authored articles. In our view there are strong arguments in favour of using fractionalised counts to calculate relative citation indexes at the national level, rather than using whole counts, which is the most common practice today.
OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftJournal of Informetrics
Vol/bind6
Nummer1
Sider (fra-til)36-43
Antal sider8
ISSN1751-1577
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2012

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 52127204