Quantitative flow ratio derived from diagnostic coronary angiography in assessment of patients with intermediate coronary stenosis: a wire-free fractional flow reserve study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  • Łukasz Kołtowski, 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland. lukasz.koltowski@wum.edu.pl.
  • ,
  • Martyna Zaleska, 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
  • ,
  • Jakub Maksym, 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
  • ,
  • Mariusz Tomaniak, 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
  • ,
  • Mateusz Soliński, Faculty of Physics, Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
  • ,
  • Dominika Puchta, 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
  • ,
  • Niels R Holm
  • Grzegorz Opolski, 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
  • ,
  • Janusz Kochman, 1st Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Warsaw, ul. Banacha 1a, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.

AIMS: To evaluate diagnostic accuracy of quantitative flow ratio (QFR). A novel method was used for non-invasive functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) is the gold standard for functional assessment of intermediate lesions. However, interrogating a stenosis with pressure wire prolongs the procedure, increases costs and carries a risk of procedure-related adverse events. QFR is a wire-free method for computation of FFR based on 3D reconstruction of angiographic images and modified TIMI frame count.

METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively computed QFR (Medis Suite XA/QAngio XA 3D/QFR, Medis/Netherlands) in suitable cases with corresponding FFR (PressureWire™, Abbott, US/). Four QFR measures were tested against FFR: (1) fixed-flow QFR (fQFR), (2) vessel QFR (vQFR), (3) lesion QFR (lQFR) and (4) index QFR (iQFR). 857 lesions (740 patients) were reviewed, 306 (268 patients) met technical inclusion criteria for QFR (two optimal angiographic projections > 25° apart; no ostial location, no overlapping/shortening, frame-rate ≥ 15 fps). Mean angiographic percentage diameter stenosis was 51.3 ± 10.18%. Wire-based FFR ≤ 0.80 was found in 130 lesions (42.5%). Strong Pearson correlation was identified for iQFR (r = 0.85), fQFR (r = 0.73), vQFR (r = 0.78) and lQFR (r = 0.70). The optimal QFR decision values corresponding to FFR = 0.80 were iQFR = 0.79 (AUC = 0.94), fQFR = 0.73 (AUC = 0.87), vQFR = 0.77 (AUC = 0.90), and lQFR = 0.83 (AUC = 0.82). Sensitivity and specificity > 95% were identified for iQFR ≤ 0.74 (n = 89, 29%) and > 0.83 (n = 116, 38%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: The QFR value at the pressure transducer position (iQFR) was the best corresponding QFR model. iQFR is characterised by high diagnostic accuracy and used in a hybrid model with FFR which may reduce the number of procedures requiring pressure-wire by two-thirds.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftClinical Research in Cardiology
Vol/bind107
Nummer9
Sider (fra-til)858-867
Antal sider10
ISSN1861-0684
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2018

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 132410472