Aarhus University Seal / Aarhus Universitets segl

Privacy encounters in Teledialogue

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Privacy encounters in Teledialogue. / Andersen, Lars Bo; Bøge, Ask Risom; Danholt, Peter; Lauritsen, Peter.

I: Information, Communication & Society, Bind 21, Nr. 2, 2018, s. 257-272.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

Andersen, LB, Bøge, AR, Danholt, P & Lauritsen, P 2018, 'Privacy encounters in Teledialogue', Information, Communication & Society, bind 21, nr. 2, s. 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271904

APA

Andersen, L. B., Bøge, A. R., Danholt, P., & Lauritsen, P. (2018). Privacy encounters in Teledialogue. Information, Communication & Society, 21(2), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271904

CBE

Andersen LB, Bøge AR, Danholt P, Lauritsen P. 2018. Privacy encounters in Teledialogue. Information, Communication & Society. 21(2):257-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271904

MLA

Andersen, Lars Bo o.a.. "Privacy encounters in Teledialogue". Information, Communication & Society. 2018, 21(2). 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271904

Vancouver

Andersen LB, Bøge AR, Danholt P, Lauritsen P. Privacy encounters in Teledialogue. Information, Communication & Society. 2018;21(2):257-272. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271904

Author

Andersen, Lars Bo ; Bøge, Ask Risom ; Danholt, Peter ; Lauritsen, Peter. / Privacy encounters in Teledialogue. I: Information, Communication & Society. 2018 ; Bind 21, Nr. 2. s. 257-272.

Bibtex

@article{ffc5bc66feab4cf8a0d54ba8d46a859b,
title = "Privacy encounters in Teledialogue",
abstract = "Privacy is a major concern when new technologies are introduced between public authorities and private citizens. What is meant by privacy, however, is often unclear and contested. Accordingly, this article utilises grounded theory to study privacy empirically in the research and design project Teledialogue aimed at introducing new ways for public case managers and placed children to communicate through IT. The resulting argument is that privacy can be understood as an encounter, that is, as something that arises between implicated actors and entails some degree of friction and negotiation. An argument which is further qualified through the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. The article opens with a review of privacy literature before continuing to present privacy as an encounter with five different foci: what technologies bring into the encounter; who is related to privacy by implication; what is entailed by the spaces of Teledialogue; how privacy relates to projected futures; and how privacy is also an encounter between authority and care. In the end, it is discussed how privacy conceptualised as an encounter is not already there surrounding people or places but rather has to be traced in the specific and situated relations between implicated actors, giving rise to different normative concerns in each case.",
author = "Andersen, {Lars Bo} and B{\o}ge, {Ask Risom} and Peter Danholt and Peter Lauritsen",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271904",
language = "Dansk",
volume = "21",
pages = "257--272",
journal = "Information, Communication & Society",
issn = "1369-118X",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis Online",
number = "2",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Privacy encounters in Teledialogue

AU - Andersen, Lars Bo

AU - Bøge, Ask Risom

AU - Danholt, Peter

AU - Lauritsen, Peter

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - Privacy is a major concern when new technologies are introduced between public authorities and private citizens. What is meant by privacy, however, is often unclear and contested. Accordingly, this article utilises grounded theory to study privacy empirically in the research and design project Teledialogue aimed at introducing new ways for public case managers and placed children to communicate through IT. The resulting argument is that privacy can be understood as an encounter, that is, as something that arises between implicated actors and entails some degree of friction and negotiation. An argument which is further qualified through the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. The article opens with a review of privacy literature before continuing to present privacy as an encounter with five different foci: what technologies bring into the encounter; who is related to privacy by implication; what is entailed by the spaces of Teledialogue; how privacy relates to projected futures; and how privacy is also an encounter between authority and care. In the end, it is discussed how privacy conceptualised as an encounter is not already there surrounding people or places but rather has to be traced in the specific and situated relations between implicated actors, giving rise to different normative concerns in each case.

AB - Privacy is a major concern when new technologies are introduced between public authorities and private citizens. What is meant by privacy, however, is often unclear and contested. Accordingly, this article utilises grounded theory to study privacy empirically in the research and design project Teledialogue aimed at introducing new ways for public case managers and placed children to communicate through IT. The resulting argument is that privacy can be understood as an encounter, that is, as something that arises between implicated actors and entails some degree of friction and negotiation. An argument which is further qualified through the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. The article opens with a review of privacy literature before continuing to present privacy as an encounter with five different foci: what technologies bring into the encounter; who is related to privacy by implication; what is entailed by the spaces of Teledialogue; how privacy relates to projected futures; and how privacy is also an encounter between authority and care. In the end, it is discussed how privacy conceptualised as an encounter is not already there surrounding people or places but rather has to be traced in the specific and situated relations between implicated actors, giving rise to different normative concerns in each case.

U2 - 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271904

DO - 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1271904

M3 - Tidsskriftartikel

VL - 21

SP - 257

EP - 272

JO - Information, Communication & Society

JF - Information, Communication & Society

SN - 1369-118X

IS - 2

ER -