TY - JOUR
T1 - Precision on Demand:
T2 - Propositional Logic for Event-Trigger Threshold Regulation
AU - Evans, Valdemar Tang
AU - Gomes, Cláudio
AU - Lucani Rötter, Daniel Enrique
PY - 2025/2
Y1 - 2025/2
N2 - We introduce a novel event-trigger threshold (ETT) regulation mechanism based on the quantitative semantics of propositional logic (PL). We exploit the expressiveness of the PL vocabulary to deliver a precise and flexible specification of ETT regulation based on system requirements and properties. Additionally, we present a modified ETT regulation mechanism that provides formal guarantees for satisfaction/violation detection of arbitrary PL properties. To validate our proposed method, we consider a convoy of vehicles in an adaptive cruise control scenario. In this scenario, the PL operators are used to encode safety properties and the ETTs are regulated accordingly, e.g., if our safety metric is high there can be a higher ETT threshold, while a smaller threshold is used when the system is approaching unsafe conditions. Under ideal ETT regulation conditions in this safety scenario, we show that reductions between 41.8% and 96.3% in the number of triggered events is possible compared to using a constant ETT while maintaining similar safety conditions.
AB - We introduce a novel event-trigger threshold (ETT) regulation mechanism based on the quantitative semantics of propositional logic (PL). We exploit the expressiveness of the PL vocabulary to deliver a precise and flexible specification of ETT regulation based on system requirements and properties. Additionally, we present a modified ETT regulation mechanism that provides formal guarantees for satisfaction/violation detection of arbitrary PL properties. To validate our proposed method, we consider a convoy of vehicles in an adaptive cruise control scenario. In this scenario, the PL operators are used to encode safety properties and the ETTs are regulated accordingly, e.g., if our safety metric is high there can be a higher ETT threshold, while a smaller threshold is used when the system is approaching unsafe conditions. Under ideal ETT regulation conditions in this safety scenario, we show that reductions between 41.8% and 96.3% in the number of triggered events is possible compared to using a constant ETT while maintaining similar safety conditions.
KW - Event-triggering mechanisms
KW - Interval Arithmetic
KW - Propositional Logic
KW - propositional logic (PL)
KW - interval arithmetic
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85206837993
U2 - 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3476922
DO - 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3476922
M3 - Journal article
SN - 2327-4662
VL - 12
SP - 2674
EP - 2689
JO - IEEE Internet of Things Journal
JF - IEEE Internet of Things Journal
IS - 3
ER -