Institut for Statskundskab

Personal Responsibility in Health and Healthcare: Luck Egalitarianism as a plausible and flexible approach to health

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

Allocating health care resources based on personal responsibility is a prominent and controversial idea. This article assesses the plausibility of such measures through the lens of luck egalitarianism, a prominent responsibility-sensitive theory of distributive justice. This article presents a framework of luck egalitarianism in health, which integrates other concerns of justice than health, is pluralist, and is compatible with a wide range of measures for giving lower priority to those deemed responsible. Applying this framework to oral health, the allocation of livers among potential transplant recipients and travel insurance demonstrates that this version of luck egalitarianism is a much more attractive and flexible theory than much of the contemporary discussion allows. This also pertains to its ability to provide plausible answers to two prominent critiques of harshness and intrusiveness. The discussion also shows that the luck egalitarian commitment to eliminating the influence of luck on people’s lives is likely to require substantial redistribution.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftPolitical Research Quarterly
Vol/bind73
Nummer3
Sider (fra-til)583-595
Antal sider13
ISSN1065-9129
DOI
StatusUdgivet - sep. 2020

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 143285697