Paternalism Is Not Less Wrong in Intimate Relationships

Andreas Bengtson; Søren Flinch Midtgaard

doi:10.1163/17455243-20234154

Paternalism Is Not Less Wrong in Intimate Relationships

Andreas Bengtson^*, Søren Flinch Midtgaard

^*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Institut for Statskundskab

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

2 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Many believe that paternalism is less wrong in intimate relationships. In this paper, we argue that this view cannot be justified by appeal to (i) beneficence, (ii) shared projects, (iii) vulnerability, (iv) epistemic access, (v) expressivism, or (vi) autonomy as nonalienation. We finally provide an error theory for why many may have believed that paternalism is less wrong in intimate relations.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Journal of Moral Philosophy
ISSN	1740-4681
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1163/17455243-20234154
Status	E-pub / Early view - 2023

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1163/17455243-20234154

Andre filer og links

Link to publication in Scopus

Citationsformater

@article{c8511bafb8e745a4a4e3e2929c3a518b,

title = "Paternalism Is Not Less Wrong in Intimate Relationships",

abstract = "Many believe that paternalism is less wrong in intimate relationships. In this paper, we argue that this view cannot be justified by appeal to (i) beneficence, (ii) shared projects, (iii) vulnerability, (iv) epistemic access, (v) expressivism, or (vi) autonomy as nonalienation. We finally provide an error theory for why many may have believed that paternalism is less wrong in intimate relations.",

keywords = "beneficence, error theory, intimate relations, paternalism, shared projects",

author = "Andreas Bengtson and Midtgaard, {S{\o}ren Flinch}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Andreas Bengtson and S{\o}ren Flinch Midtgaard, 2023.",

year = "2023",

doi = "10.1163/17455243-20234154",

language = "English",

journal = "Journal of Moral Philosophy",

issn = "1740-4681",

publisher = "Brill Academic Publishers",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paternalism Is Not Less Wrong in Intimate Relationships

AU - Bengtson, Andreas

AU - Midtgaard, Søren Flinch

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Andreas Bengtson and Søren Flinch Midtgaard, 2023.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Many believe that paternalism is less wrong in intimate relationships. In this paper, we argue that this view cannot be justified by appeal to (i) beneficence, (ii) shared projects, (iii) vulnerability, (iv) epistemic access, (v) expressivism, or (vi) autonomy as nonalienation. We finally provide an error theory for why many may have believed that paternalism is less wrong in intimate relations.

AB - Many believe that paternalism is less wrong in intimate relationships. In this paper, we argue that this view cannot be justified by appeal to (i) beneficence, (ii) shared projects, (iii) vulnerability, (iv) epistemic access, (v) expressivism, or (vi) autonomy as nonalienation. We finally provide an error theory for why many may have believed that paternalism is less wrong in intimate relations.

KW - beneficence

KW - error theory

KW - intimate relations

KW - paternalism

KW - shared projects

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85175606301&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1163/17455243-20234154

DO - 10.1163/17455243-20234154

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85175606301

SN - 1740-4681

JO - Journal of Moral Philosophy

JF - Journal of Moral Philosophy

ER -

Paternalism Is Not Less Wrong in Intimate Relationships

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Andre filer og links

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater