On the interplay between pain observation, guilt and shame proneness and honesty

Panagiotis Mitkidis*, Hanna Thaler, Sonja Perkovic, Shahar Ayal, Simon Tobias Schulz Karg, Dan Ariely

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

1 Citationer (Scopus)
30 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Seeing others in pain can stimulate powerful socio-emotional responses. Does it also make us more moral? In two laboratory experiments, we examined the interplay between pain observation, self-reported guilt and shame, subjective perceptions of pain intensity, and subsequent honest behavior. Watching a confederate perform a moderately painful (vs. non-painful) task did not affect honest behavior in a subsequent die-roll task. Independent of pain observation, there was a positive relationship between self-reported guilt proneness and shame proneness and honesty. More specifically, individuals who are more prone to feeling guilt -and to a lesser extent shame- behaved more honestly. Furthermore, we found weak support for the hypothesis that greater perceived pain (rather than objective pain) is associated with less cheating. We call for further research in the interconnections between perceived pain, guilt, shame, and moral behavior.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer103920
TidsskriftActa Psychologica
Vol/bind236
Antal sider8
ISSN0001-6918
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jun. 2023

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'On the interplay between pain observation, guilt and shame proneness and honesty'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater