Abstract
Various assumptions on a right-censoring mechanism to ensure consistency of the Kaplan–Meier and Aalen–Johansen estimators in a competing risks setting are studied. Specifically, eight different assumptions are seen to fall in two categories: a weaker identifiability assumption, which is the weakest possible assumption in a precise sense, and a stronger representativity assumption which ensures the existence of an independent censoring time. When a given censoring time is considered, similar assumptions can be made on the censoring time. This allows for a characterization of so-called pointwise independence as well as full independence of censoring time and event time and type. Examples illustrate how the various assumptions differ.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Scandinavian Journal of Statistics |
Vol/bind | 48 |
Nummer | 4 |
Sider (fra-til) | 1234-1255 |
Antal sider | 22 |
ISSN | 0303-6898 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - dec. 2021 |