Normal science: not uncritical or dogmatic

Samuel Schindler*

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

When Kuhn first published his Structure of Scientific Revolutions he was accused of promoting an “irrationalist” account of science. Although it has since been argued that this charge is unfair in one aspect or another, the early criticism still exerts an influence on our understanding of Kuhn. In particular, normal science is often characterized as dogmatic and uncritical, even by commentators sympathetic to Kuhn. I argue not only that there is no textual evidence for this view but also that normal science is much better understood as being based on epistemically justified commitment to a paradigm and as pragmatic in its handling of anomalies. I also argue that normal science is an example of what I call Kuhn’s program of revisionary rational reconstruction.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer108
TidsskriftSynthese
Vol/bind203
Nummer4
ISSN0039-7857
DOI
StatusUdgivet - apr. 2024

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Normal science: not uncritical or dogmatic'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater