Aarhus Universitets segl

Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis. / Riemenschneider, Morten; Trénel, Philipp; Nørgaard, Michael et al.
I: Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, Bind 65, 104012, 09.2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

Riemenschneider, M, Trénel, P, Nørgaard, M & Boesen, F 2022, 'Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis', Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, bind 65, 104012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.104012

APA

Riemenschneider, M., Trénel, P., Nørgaard, M., & Boesen, F. (2022). Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 65, artikel 104012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.104012

CBE

Riemenschneider M, Trénel P, Nørgaard M, Boesen F. 2022. Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 65:Article 104012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.104012

MLA

Vancouver

Riemenschneider M, Trénel P, Nørgaard M, Boesen F. Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2022 sep.;65:104012. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104012

Author

Riemenschneider, Morten ; Trénel, Philipp ; Nørgaard, Michael et al. / Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis. I: Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders. 2022 ; Bind 65.

Bibtex

@article{d44dd9a53c6a4b12a6fcabebbc80ebc6,
title = "Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis",
abstract = "Objective: To provide a multimethodological validation of MFIS in compliance with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines using a Danish population of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). Methods: Factor analytic and multidimensional Rasch analytic methods were applied to investigate the structural validity of MFIS. We employed measurement and bi-factor models to address divergence and convergence. McDonalds ω was used to assess reliability. Cross-cultural and nomological validity was assessed in relation to relevant external populations and constructs, respectively. Responsiveness was evaluated following one month of multi-disciplinary rehabilitation (MDR). Results: Based on data from 424 Danish MS patients, the MFIS showed an acceptable fit to both factor analytic and multidimensional Rasch models. MFIS was found to be dominated by a general factor but with considerable substructure present. Sufficient divergence was found between cognitive and physical subdomains, but not the psychosocial subscale. Mc Donald's ωt of 0.96 indicated good reliability of the scale, however, with low specific reliability of the psychosocial subscale. Homogeneity across Danish and European populations of pwMS supported cross-cultural validity. Explorative factor analysis of the nomological network of MFIS revealed expected convergence with cognitive and physical aspects. MFIS showed good responsiveness as indicated by moderate to large effect sizes following MDR. Conclusion: The Danish version of the MFIS showed good reliability, a good structural, cross-cultural, and nomological validity an acceptable fit to a multidimensional Rasch analysis, and a good responsiveness. The psychosocial subscale of the MFIS however should be interpreted with caution.",
author = "Morten Riemenschneider and Philipp Tr{\'e}nel and Michael N{\o}rgaard and Finn Boesen",
note = "Funding Information: The present study was not financed by any external funds. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1016/j.msard.2022.104012",
language = "English",
volume = "65",
journal = "Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders",
issn = "2211-0348",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Multimethodological validation of the modified fatigue impact scale in a Danish population of people with Multiple Sclerosis

AU - Riemenschneider, Morten

AU - Trénel, Philipp

AU - Nørgaard, Michael

AU - Boesen, Finn

N1 - Funding Information: The present study was not financed by any external funds. Publisher Copyright: © 2022

PY - 2022/9

Y1 - 2022/9

N2 - Objective: To provide a multimethodological validation of MFIS in compliance with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines using a Danish population of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). Methods: Factor analytic and multidimensional Rasch analytic methods were applied to investigate the structural validity of MFIS. We employed measurement and bi-factor models to address divergence and convergence. McDonalds ω was used to assess reliability. Cross-cultural and nomological validity was assessed in relation to relevant external populations and constructs, respectively. Responsiveness was evaluated following one month of multi-disciplinary rehabilitation (MDR). Results: Based on data from 424 Danish MS patients, the MFIS showed an acceptable fit to both factor analytic and multidimensional Rasch models. MFIS was found to be dominated by a general factor but with considerable substructure present. Sufficient divergence was found between cognitive and physical subdomains, but not the psychosocial subscale. Mc Donald's ωt of 0.96 indicated good reliability of the scale, however, with low specific reliability of the psychosocial subscale. Homogeneity across Danish and European populations of pwMS supported cross-cultural validity. Explorative factor analysis of the nomological network of MFIS revealed expected convergence with cognitive and physical aspects. MFIS showed good responsiveness as indicated by moderate to large effect sizes following MDR. Conclusion: The Danish version of the MFIS showed good reliability, a good structural, cross-cultural, and nomological validity an acceptable fit to a multidimensional Rasch analysis, and a good responsiveness. The psychosocial subscale of the MFIS however should be interpreted with caution.

AB - Objective: To provide a multimethodological validation of MFIS in compliance with the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines using a Danish population of patients with Multiple Sclerosis (pwMS). Methods: Factor analytic and multidimensional Rasch analytic methods were applied to investigate the structural validity of MFIS. We employed measurement and bi-factor models to address divergence and convergence. McDonalds ω was used to assess reliability. Cross-cultural and nomological validity was assessed in relation to relevant external populations and constructs, respectively. Responsiveness was evaluated following one month of multi-disciplinary rehabilitation (MDR). Results: Based on data from 424 Danish MS patients, the MFIS showed an acceptable fit to both factor analytic and multidimensional Rasch models. MFIS was found to be dominated by a general factor but with considerable substructure present. Sufficient divergence was found between cognitive and physical subdomains, but not the psychosocial subscale. Mc Donald's ωt of 0.96 indicated good reliability of the scale, however, with low specific reliability of the psychosocial subscale. Homogeneity across Danish and European populations of pwMS supported cross-cultural validity. Explorative factor analysis of the nomological network of MFIS revealed expected convergence with cognitive and physical aspects. MFIS showed good responsiveness as indicated by moderate to large effect sizes following MDR. Conclusion: The Danish version of the MFIS showed good reliability, a good structural, cross-cultural, and nomological validity an acceptable fit to a multidimensional Rasch analysis, and a good responsiveness. The psychosocial subscale of the MFIS however should be interpreted with caution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85133906554&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104012

DO - 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104012

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 35820358

AN - SCOPUS:85133906554

VL - 65

JO - Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

JF - Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders

SN - 2211-0348

M1 - 104012

ER -