Aarhus Universitets segl

English

Du er her: AU » Om AU » Organisation » More on seed longevity phenotyping

Om AU

More on seed longevity phenotyping

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Standard

More on seed longevity phenotyping. / Hay, Fiona; Davies, Rachael; Dickie, John et al.
I: Seed Science Research, Bind 32, Nr. 3, 09.2022, s. 144-149.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

Harvard

Hay, F, Davies, R, Dickie, J, Merritt, D & Wolkis, D 2022, 'More on seed longevity phenotyping', Seed Science Research, bind 32, nr. 3, s. 144-149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258522000034

APA

Hay, F., Davies, R., Dickie, J., Merritt, D., & Wolkis, D. (2022). More on seed longevity phenotyping. Seed Science Research, 32(3), 144-149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258522000034

CBE

Hay F, Davies R, Dickie J, Merritt D, Wolkis D. 2022. More on seed longevity phenotyping. Seed Science Research. 32(3):144-149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258522000034

MLA

Hay, Fiona et al. "More on seed longevity phenotyping". Seed Science Research. 2022, 32(3). 144-149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258522000034

Vancouver

Hay F, Davies R, Dickie J, Merritt D, Wolkis D. More on seed longevity phenotyping. Seed Science Research. 2022 sep.;32(3):144-149. doi: 10.1017/S0960258522000034

Author

Hay, Fiona ; Davies, Rachael ; Dickie, John et al. / More on seed longevity phenotyping. I: Seed Science Research. 2022 ; Bind 32, Nr. 3. s. 144-149.

Bibtex

@article{ddebaf306ad74da6a06a25901ff75227,
title = "More on seed longevity phenotyping",
abstract = "Understanding the relative longevity of different seed lots, perhaps of different species or genotypes, but also following production under different environments or using different cultivation methods, or following different post-harvest treatments, is relevant to anyone concerned with the retention of seed lot viability and vigour during storage. However, different scientists over the years have used different conditions to assess seed lot longevity, as well as different variables as the measure of 'longevity.' Here, we give some of the backgrounds to how two standard protocols, with an open and closed system respectively, were derived, and explain why we consider p50, defined as the time during storage when seed lot viability, as measured through a germination test, has declined to 50%, is a suitable longevity trait parameter.",
keywords = "comparative longevity protocol, orthodox seeds, p, p50, plant conservation, seed storage, seed traits",
author = "Fiona Hay and Rachael Davies and John Dickie and David Merritt and Dustin Wolkis",
year = "2022",
month = sep,
doi = "10.1017/S0960258522000034",
language = "English",
volume = "32",
pages = "144--149",
journal = "Seed Science Research",
issn = "0960-2585",
publisher = "Cambridge University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - More on seed longevity phenotyping

AU - Hay, Fiona

AU - Davies, Rachael

AU - Dickie, John

AU - Merritt, David

AU - Wolkis, Dustin

PY - 2022/9

Y1 - 2022/9

N2 - Understanding the relative longevity of different seed lots, perhaps of different species or genotypes, but also following production under different environments or using different cultivation methods, or following different post-harvest treatments, is relevant to anyone concerned with the retention of seed lot viability and vigour during storage. However, different scientists over the years have used different conditions to assess seed lot longevity, as well as different variables as the measure of 'longevity.' Here, we give some of the backgrounds to how two standard protocols, with an open and closed system respectively, were derived, and explain why we consider p50, defined as the time during storage when seed lot viability, as measured through a germination test, has declined to 50%, is a suitable longevity trait parameter.

AB - Understanding the relative longevity of different seed lots, perhaps of different species or genotypes, but also following production under different environments or using different cultivation methods, or following different post-harvest treatments, is relevant to anyone concerned with the retention of seed lot viability and vigour during storage. However, different scientists over the years have used different conditions to assess seed lot longevity, as well as different variables as the measure of 'longevity.' Here, we give some of the backgrounds to how two standard protocols, with an open and closed system respectively, were derived, and explain why we consider p50, defined as the time during storage when seed lot viability, as measured through a germination test, has declined to 50%, is a suitable longevity trait parameter.

KW - comparative longevity protocol

KW - orthodox seeds

KW - p

KW - p50

KW - plant conservation

KW - seed storage

KW - seed traits

U2 - 10.1017/S0960258522000034

DO - 10.1017/S0960258522000034

M3 - Journal article

VL - 32

SP - 144

EP - 149

JO - Seed Science Research

JF - Seed Science Research

SN - 0960-2585

IS - 3

ER -