TY - JOUR
T1 - Methylation microarray-based detection of clinical copy-number aberrations in CLL benchmarked to standard FISH analysis
AU - Hussmann, Dianna
AU - Starnawska, Anna
AU - Kristensen, Louise
AU - Daugaard, Iben
AU - Cédile, Oriane
AU - Nguyen, Vivi Quoc
AU - Kjeldsen, Tina E.
AU - Hansen, Christine Søholm
AU - Bybjerg-Grauholm, Jonas
AU - Kristensen, Thomas
AU - Larsen, Thomas Stauffer
AU - Møller, Michael Boe
AU - Nyvold, Charlotte Guldborg
AU - Hansen, Lise Lotte
AU - Wojdacz, Tomasz K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022
PY - 2022/11
Y1 - 2022/11
N2 - Copy-number aberrations (CNAs) are assessed using FISH analysis in diagnostics of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but CNAs can also be extrapolated from Illumina BeadChips developed for genome-wide methylation microarray screening. Increasing numbers of microarray data-sets are available from diagnostic samples, making it useful to assess the potential in CNA diagnostics. We benchmarked the limitations of CNA testing from two Illumina BeadChips (EPIC and 450k) and using two common packages for analysis (conumee and ChAMP) to FISH-based assessment of 11q, 13q, and 17p deletions in 202 CLL samples. Overall, the two packages predicted CNAs with similar accuracy regardless of the microarray type, but lower than FISH-based assessment. We showed that the bioinformatics analysis needs to be adjusted to the specific CNA, as no general settings were identified. Altogether, we were able to predict CNAs using methylation microarray data, however, with limited accuracy, making FISH-based assessment of deletions the superior diagnostic choice.
AB - Copy-number aberrations (CNAs) are assessed using FISH analysis in diagnostics of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), but CNAs can also be extrapolated from Illumina BeadChips developed for genome-wide methylation microarray screening. Increasing numbers of microarray data-sets are available from diagnostic samples, making it useful to assess the potential in CNA diagnostics. We benchmarked the limitations of CNA testing from two Illumina BeadChips (EPIC and 450k) and using two common packages for analysis (conumee and ChAMP) to FISH-based assessment of 11q, 13q, and 17p deletions in 202 CLL samples. Overall, the two packages predicted CNAs with similar accuracy regardless of the microarray type, but lower than FISH-based assessment. We showed that the bioinformatics analysis needs to be adjusted to the specific CNA, as no general settings were identified. Altogether, we were able to predict CNAs using methylation microarray data, however, with limited accuracy, making FISH-based assessment of deletions the superior diagnostic choice.
KW - 450k
KW - Chronic lymphocytic leukemia
KW - CNA assessment
KW - Copy-number aberration
KW - EPIC
KW - Methylation microarray
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85140607195&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110510
DO - 10.1016/j.ygeno.2022.110510
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36272495
AN - SCOPUS:85140607195
SN - 0888-7543
VL - 114
JO - Genomics
JF - Genomics
IS - 6
M1 - 110510
ER -