Abstract
The contrasts between so-called objective and subjective measures of consciousness have been a dominating topic of discussion for decades. The debate has classically been dominated by two positions – that subjective measures may be completely or partially reduced to objective measures, and, alternatively that they must exist in parallel. I argue that many problems relate to subjective reports as they can be imprecise and vulnerable to a number of potential confounding factors. However, I also argue that despite the fact that subjective reports are fallible, all objective measures are derived from subjective measures, and, thus, will never under normal circumstances be more correct. I propose that the best and possibly only realistic way forward is a specific version of a “middle ground”: to attempt to improve subjective reports in a collaboration with objective research methods.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences |
Vol/bind | 24 |
Nummer | 2 |
Sider (fra-til) | 345-358 |
Antal sider | 14 |
ISSN | 1568-7759 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - apr. 2025 |