Mapping the field of cultural evolutionary theory and methods in archaeology using bibliometric methods

TY - JOUR

T1 - Mapping the field of cultural evolutionary theory and methods in archaeology using bibliometric methods

AU - Matzig, David N.

AU - Schmid, Clemens

AU - Riede, Felix

PY - 2023/12

Y1 - 2023/12

N2 - Bibliometrics offers powerful means of visualising and understanding trends within research domains. We here present a first exploratory bibliometric analysis of cultural evolutionary theory and attendant methods as applied specifically within archaeology across the last four decades (1981–2021). Bibliographic coupling network analysis shows that there exists a broadly successive series of author clusters making up the core of this research domain. A broader vernacular version of cultural evolution is also commonly used in thematic or regional research traditions that fall outside of cultural evolutionary studies in the strict sense. Our bibliometric networks trace the development of evolutionary archaeology over the last four decades and while they demonstrate the centrality of computational models, they also suggest a stagnation in the application of precisely that suite of methods—phylogenetics—that is central to evolutionary archaeology’s biological counterpart palaeontology. Recent methodological innovations in palaeobiology are, however, offering new ways of integrating artefact shape data directly with phylogenetic applications. This development may usher in a renaissance in artefact phylogenetics and appropriately macro-scale applications of cultural evolutionary theory in archaeology.

AB - Bibliometrics offers powerful means of visualising and understanding trends within research domains. We here present a first exploratory bibliometric analysis of cultural evolutionary theory and attendant methods as applied specifically within archaeology across the last four decades (1981–2021). Bibliographic coupling network analysis shows that there exists a broadly successive series of author clusters making up the core of this research domain. A broader vernacular version of cultural evolution is also commonly used in thematic or regional research traditions that fall outside of cultural evolutionary studies in the strict sense. Our bibliometric networks trace the development of evolutionary archaeology over the last four decades and while they demonstrate the centrality of computational models, they also suggest a stagnation in the application of precisely that suite of methods—phylogenetics—that is central to evolutionary archaeology’s biological counterpart palaeontology. Recent methodological innovations in palaeobiology are, however, offering new ways of integrating artefact shape data directly with phylogenetic applications. This development may usher in a renaissance in artefact phylogenetics and appropriately macro-scale applications of cultural evolutionary theory in archaeology.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160923807&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1057/s41599-023-01767-y

DO - 10.1057/s41599-023-01767-y

M3 - Journal article

SN - 2662-9992

VL - 10

JO - Humanities & Social Sciences Communications

JF - Humanities & Social Sciences Communications

IS - 1

M1 - 271

ER -