Projekter pr. år
Abstract
Under mandated choice policies, people are free to choose whichever option they prefer, but “choosing not to choose” is penalized. In Australia, voting is mandatory, and abstaining is penalized with a fine. In New Zealand and several American states, it is mandatory for those who want to obtain a driver’s license that they decide whether to register as organ donors. If they fail to do so, they will not receive a driver’s license. Proponents of such policies stress that they may be the least autonomy-infringing ways of achieving some good and provide society with knowledge about people’s preferences and are, partly for these reasons, preferable to employing defaults. This article compares mandated choice in voting and donor registration with respect to the ends served, how a mandated choice policy will serve these ends, the distribution of burdens, and the nature of the possible options. It is argued that mandated choice is more attractive in the context of donor registration.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | Political Research Quarterly |
Vol/bind | 74 |
Nummer | 3 |
Sider (fra-til) | 744-755 |
Antal sider | 12 |
ISSN | 1065-9129 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - sep. 2021 |
Begivenhed | 50. Årsmøde i dansk selskab for statskundskab 2018 - Hotel Vejle Fjord, Vejle, Danmark Varighed: 1 nov. 2018 → 2 nov. 2018 http://dpsa.dk/pages/page.asp?pid=3&l=dk |
Konference
Konference | 50. Årsmøde i dansk selskab for statskundskab 2018 |
---|---|
Lokation | Hotel Vejle Fjord |
Land/Område | Danmark |
By | Vejle |
Periode | 01/11/2018 → 02/11/2018 |
Internetadresse |
Fingeraftryk
Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Mandated Choice Policies: When are they preferable?'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.Projekter
- 1 Afsluttet
-
Political equality and voting matters
Albertsen, A. B. (Deltager)
01/04/2018 → 31/10/2019
Projekter: Projekt › Forskning