TY - JOUR
T1 - Likelihood reclassification by an acoustic-based score in suspected coronary artery disease
AU - Rasmussen, Laust Dupont
AU - Winther, Simon
AU - Karim, Salma Raghad
AU - Westra, Jelmer
AU - Kirk Johansen, Jane
AU - Søndergaard, Hanne Maare
AU - Hammid, Osama
AU - Sevestre, Emelyne
AU - Onuma, Yoshinobu
AU - Nyegaard, Mette
AU - Ejlersen, June Anita
AU - Christiansen, Evald
AU - Eftekhari, Ashkan
AU - Holm, Niels Ramsing
AU - Schmidt, Samuel Emil
AU - Bøttcher, Morten
N1 - Funding Information:
The study was supported by the Health Research Fund of Central Denmark Region, Aarhus University Research Foundation and by an institutional research grant from Acarix, Denmark.
Funding Information:
SW acknowledges support from the Novo Nordisk Foundation Clinical Emerging Investigator grant (NNF21OC0066981). MB discloses advisory board participation for Novo Nordisk, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Boeringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Sanofi, Novartis, Amgen, CLS-Behring and Acarix. The remaining authors have nothing to declare.
Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2023/8/1
Y1 - 2023/8/1
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Validation studies of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology pretest probability model (ESC-PTP) for coronary artery disease (CAD) report that 35%-40% of patients have low pretest probability (ESC-PTP 5% to <15%). Acoustic detection of coronary stenoses could potentially improve clinical likelihood stratification. Aims were to (1) investigate the diagnostic performance of an acoustic-based CAD score and (2) study the reclassification potential of a dual likelihood strategy by the ESC-PTP and a CAD score.METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=1683) with stable angina symptoms referred for coronary CT angiography (CTA) underwent heart sound analyses by an acoustic CAD-score device. All patients with ≥50% luminal stenosis in any coronary segment at coronary CTA were referred to investigation with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR).A predefined CAD-score cut-off ≤20 was used to rule out obstructive CAD.RESULTS: In total, 439 patients (26%) had ≥50% luminal stenosis on coronary CTA. The subsequent ICA with FFR showed obstructive CAD in 199 patients (11.8%). Using the ≤20 CAD-score cut-off for obstructive CAD rule-out, sensitivity was 85.4% (95% CI 79.7 to 90.0), specificity 40.4% (95% CI 37.9 to 42.9), positive predictive value 16.1% (95% CI 13.9 to 18.5) and negative predictive value 95.4% (95% CI 93.4 to 96.9) in all patients. Applying the cut-off in ESC-PTP 5% to <15% patients, 316 patients (48%) were down-classified to very-low likelihood. The obstructive CAD prevalence was 3.5% in this group.CONCLUSION: In a large contemporary cohort of patients with low CAD likelihood, the additional use of an acoustic rule-out device showed a clear potential to downgrade likelihood and could supplement current strategies for likelihood assessment to avoid unnecessary testing.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03481712.
AB - OBJECTIVE: Validation studies of the 2019 European Society of Cardiology pretest probability model (ESC-PTP) for coronary artery disease (CAD) report that 35%-40% of patients have low pretest probability (ESC-PTP 5% to <15%). Acoustic detection of coronary stenoses could potentially improve clinical likelihood stratification. Aims were to (1) investigate the diagnostic performance of an acoustic-based CAD score and (2) study the reclassification potential of a dual likelihood strategy by the ESC-PTP and a CAD score.METHODS: Consecutive patients (n=1683) with stable angina symptoms referred for coronary CT angiography (CTA) underwent heart sound analyses by an acoustic CAD-score device. All patients with ≥50% luminal stenosis in any coronary segment at coronary CTA were referred to investigation with invasive coronary angiography (ICA) with fractional flow reserve (FFR).A predefined CAD-score cut-off ≤20 was used to rule out obstructive CAD.RESULTS: In total, 439 patients (26%) had ≥50% luminal stenosis on coronary CTA. The subsequent ICA with FFR showed obstructive CAD in 199 patients (11.8%). Using the ≤20 CAD-score cut-off for obstructive CAD rule-out, sensitivity was 85.4% (95% CI 79.7 to 90.0), specificity 40.4% (95% CI 37.9 to 42.9), positive predictive value 16.1% (95% CI 13.9 to 18.5) and negative predictive value 95.4% (95% CI 93.4 to 96.9) in all patients. Applying the cut-off in ESC-PTP 5% to <15% patients, 316 patients (48%) were down-classified to very-low likelihood. The obstructive CAD prevalence was 3.5% in this group.CONCLUSION: In a large contemporary cohort of patients with low CAD likelihood, the additional use of an acoustic rule-out device showed a clear potential to downgrade likelihood and could supplement current strategies for likelihood assessment to avoid unnecessary testing.TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03481712.
KW - atherosclerosis
KW - coronary artery disease
KW - diagnostic imaging
KW - Predictive Value of Tests
KW - Constriction, Pathologic
KW - Humans
KW - Probability
KW - Acoustics
KW - Computed Tomography Angiography
KW - Coronary Artery Disease/diagnostic imaging
KW - Coronary Angiography
KW - Coronary Stenosis/diagnostic imaging
KW - Fractional Flow Reserve, Myocardial
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85152460509&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322357
DO - 10.1136/heartjnl-2023-322357
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36878672
AN - SCOPUS:85152460509
SN - 1355-6037
VL - 109
SP - 1223
EP - 1230
JO - Heart
JF - Heart
IS - 16
M1 - heartjnl-2023-322357
ER -