TY - JOUR
T1 - Latest-iteration balloon- and self-expandable transcatheter valves for severe bicuspid aortic stenosis
T2 - the TRITON study
AU - Amat-Santos, Ignacio J.
AU - García-Gómez, Mario
AU - de Marco, Federico
AU - Won-Keun, Kim
AU - Brito, Joao
AU - Halim, Jonathan
AU - Jose, John
AU - Sengotuvelu, Gunasekaran
AU - Seth, Ashok
AU - Terkelsen, Christian
AU - Protasiewicz, Marcin
AU - Bonilla, Nelson
AU - García, Bruno
AU - Sánchez-Luna, Juan Pablo
AU - Blasco-Turrión, Sara
AU - González, José Carlos
AU - González-Bartol, Esther
AU - Ijsselmuiden, Alexander J.J.
AU - Gómez-Salvador, Itziar
AU - Carrasco Moraleja, Manuel
AU - San Román, Alberto
PY - 2023/11
Y1 - 2023/11
N2 - Introduction and objectives: No comparisons have been published yet regarding the newest iteration of balloon- and self-expandable transcatheter heart valves for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis. Methods: Multicenter registry of consecutive patients with severe BAV stenosis treated with balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (Myval and SAPIEN 3 Ultra, S3U) or self-expanding Evolut PRO+ (EP + ). TriMatch analysis was carried out to minimize the impact of baseline differences. The primary endpoint of the study was 30-day device success, and the secondary endpoints were the composite and individual components of early safety at 30 days. Results: A total of 360 patients (age 76.6 ± 7.6 years, 71.9% males) were included: 122 Myval (33.9%), 129 S3U (35.8%), and 109 EP + (30.3%). The mean STS score was 3.6 ± 1.9%. There were no cases of coronary artery occlusion, annulus rupture, aortic dissection, or procedural death. The primary endpoint of device success at 30 days was significantly higher in the Myval group (Myval: 100%; S3U: 87.5%; and EP + : 81.3%), mainly due to higher residual aortic gradients with S3U and greater ≥ moderate aortic regurgitation (AR) with EP +. No significant differences were found in the unadjusted rate of pacemaker implantation. Conclusions: In patients with BAV stenosis deemed unsuitable for surgery, Myval, S3U and EP + showed similar safety but balloon-expandable Myval had better gradients than S3U, and both balloon-expandable devices had lower residual AR than EP +, suggesting that, taking into consideration the patient-specific risks, any of these devices can be selected with optimal outcomes. Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en
AB - Introduction and objectives: No comparisons have been published yet regarding the newest iteration of balloon- and self-expandable transcatheter heart valves for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) stenosis. Methods: Multicenter registry of consecutive patients with severe BAV stenosis treated with balloon-expandable transcatheter heart valves (Myval and SAPIEN 3 Ultra, S3U) or self-expanding Evolut PRO+ (EP + ). TriMatch analysis was carried out to minimize the impact of baseline differences. The primary endpoint of the study was 30-day device success, and the secondary endpoints were the composite and individual components of early safety at 30 days. Results: A total of 360 patients (age 76.6 ± 7.6 years, 71.9% males) were included: 122 Myval (33.9%), 129 S3U (35.8%), and 109 EP + (30.3%). The mean STS score was 3.6 ± 1.9%. There were no cases of coronary artery occlusion, annulus rupture, aortic dissection, or procedural death. The primary endpoint of device success at 30 days was significantly higher in the Myval group (Myval: 100%; S3U: 87.5%; and EP + : 81.3%), mainly due to higher residual aortic gradients with S3U and greater ≥ moderate aortic regurgitation (AR) with EP +. No significant differences were found in the unadjusted rate of pacemaker implantation. Conclusions: In patients with BAV stenosis deemed unsuitable for surgery, Myval, S3U and EP + showed similar safety but balloon-expandable Myval had better gradients than S3U, and both balloon-expandable devices had lower residual AR than EP +, suggesting that, taking into consideration the patient-specific risks, any of these devices can be selected with optimal outcomes. Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en
KW - Aortic stenosis
KW - Balloon-expandable prosthesis
KW - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement
KW - Transcatheter heart valve
KW - VARC-3 consensus
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160340478&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.recesp.2023.02.007
DO - 10.1016/j.recesp.2023.02.007
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36898524
AN - SCOPUS:85160340478
SN - 0300-8932
VL - 76
SP - 872
EP - 880
JO - Revista Espanola de Cardiologia
JF - Revista Espanola de Cardiologia
IS - 11
ER -