Juleartikel: Betydning af anciennitet og døgnvariation for forfladigelse af akademisk lægesprog

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In the medical community Greek and Latin form a cornerstone of our daily professional communication. The use of correct terminology is under pressure, although the extent of incorrect terminology is unknown, particularly regarding the Greek suffix »-itis«, which indicates inflammation. It has been observed that the correct »-itis« suffix is being reduced to »-it« (e.g., »hepatitis« vs. »hepatit«).

METHODS: We investigated the extent of this based on observations from medical conferences in the Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology at Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.

RESULTS: Senior doctors more often use »-itis« correctly compared to junior doctors (59 vs. 39%), but there is generally room for improvement in both groups. A significant difference is observed between morning and midday conferences, with more errors occurring in the morning.

CONCLUSION: There is a tendency toward a reduction in the use of the »-itis« suffix, which can negatively impact clinical communication and patient safety. The study suggests targeted efforts to maintain correct linguistic practices in clinical settings.

FUNDING: None, con amore.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not relevant.

Bidragets oversatte titelChristmas article: Importance of seniority and daily variation for the flattening of academic medical language
OriginalsprogDansk
ArtikelnummerV20248
TidsskriftUgeskrift for Læger
Vol/bind186
Nummer50
ISSN0041-5782
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 9 dec. 2024

Emneord

  • Humans
  • Terminology as Topic
  • Denmark
  • Language
  • Gastroenterology
  • Communication

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'Juleartikel: Betydning af anciennitet og døgnvariation for forfladigelse af akademisk lægesprog'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater