TY - JOUR
T1 - Is Discrimination Harmful?
AU - Bengtson, Andreas
PY - 2024/7/1
Y1 - 2024/7/1
N2 - According to a prominent view, discrimination is wrong, when it is, because it makes people worse off. In this paper, I argue that this harm-based account runs into trouble because it cannot point to a harm, without making controversial metaphysical commitments, in cases of discrimination in which the discriminatory act kills the discriminatee. That is, the harm-based account suffers from a problem of death. I then show that the two main alternative accounts of the wrongness of discrimination—the mental-state-based account and the objective-meaning account—do not run into this problem.
AB - According to a prominent view, discrimination is wrong, when it is, because it makes people worse off. In this paper, I argue that this harm-based account runs into trouble because it cannot point to a harm, without making controversial metaphysical commitments, in cases of discrimination in which the discriminatory act kills the discriminatee. That is, the harm-based account suffers from a problem of death. I then show that the two main alternative accounts of the wrongness of discrimination—the mental-state-based account and the objective-meaning account—do not run into this problem.
KW - discrimination
KW - discriminatory killing
KW - harm-based account
KW - wrongness of discrimination
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85196078145&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.5406/21521123.61.3.08
DO - 10.5406/21521123.61.3.08
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85196078145
SN - 0003-0481
VL - 61
SP - 293
EP - 300
JO - American Philosophical Quarterly
JF - American Philosophical Quarterly
IS - 3
ER -