Investigating Direct and Indirect Globalization-Based Acculturation

Simon Ozer; Jonas R. Kunst; Seth J. Schwartz

doi:10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.07.012

Investigating Direct and Indirect Globalization-Based Acculturation

Simon Ozer, Jonas R. Kunst, Seth J. Schwartz

Psykologisk Institut

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

66 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cultural globalization affects most people around the world in contemporary, modern societies. The resulting intercultural contact have been examined using the theory of globalization-based acculturation. However, little is known about possible differences and similarities in processes underlying the effects of direct (e.g., through contact with immigrants) and indirect (e.g., engagement with cultural elements through media) forms of new cultural exposure. Drawing on the contact hypothesis, social identity theory, and symbolic threat theory, we examined whether perceived intercultural threat and local and global identities would explain whether both forms of contact result in multicultural acquisition or in ethnic protection. In Study 1 (N = 402), indirect, but not direct, intercultural contact was positively associated with multicultural acquisition; and both types of intercultural contact were negatively linked with ethnic protection. Global identity significantly mediated the association of both direct and indirect intercultural contact with both multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection, whereas perceived cultural threat only significantly mediated the associations of direct intercultural contact with multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection. In Study 2 (N = 424), higher levels of ethnic protection, and lower levels of multicultural acquisition, emerged in the experimental group primed with indirect, versus direct, intercultural contact. Furthermore, intercultural threat was negatively, and global identity positively, associated with multicultural acquisition, while intercultural threat was positively, and global identity negatively, associated with ethnic protection. Results are discussed in relation to similarities and differences across direct and indirect intercultural contact, providing a nuanced understanding of contemporary intercultural contact and globalization-based acculturation among majority populations.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	International Journal of Intercultural Relations
Vol/bind	84
Sider (fra-til)	155-167
Antal sider	13
ISSN	0147-1767
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.07.012
Status	Udgivet - sep. 2021

Adgang til dokumentet

10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.07.012Licens: CC BY

Investigating Direct and Indirect Globalization-Based Acculturation_Publisher version_2021Forlagets udgivne version, 1,12 MBLicens: CC BY

Citationsformater

@article{eec69a44865e4290ab008e1b03ec46c1,

title = "Investigating Direct and Indirect Globalization-Based Acculturation",

abstract = "Cultural globalization affects most people around the world in contemporary, modern societies. The resulting intercultural contact have been examined using the theory of globalization-based acculturation. However, little is known about possible differences and similarities in processes underlying the effects of direct (e.g., through contact with immigrants) and indirect (e.g., engagement with cultural elements through media) forms of new cultural exposure. Drawing on the contact hypothesis, social identity theory, and symbolic threat theory, we examined whether perceived intercultural threat and local and global identities would explain whether both forms of contact result in multicultural acquisition or in ethnic protection. In Study 1 (N = 402), indirect, but not direct, intercultural contact was positively associated with multicultural acquisition; and both types of intercultural contact were negatively linked with ethnic protection. Global identity significantly mediated the association of both direct and indirect intercultural contact with both multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection, whereas perceived cultural threat only significantly mediated the associations of direct intercultural contact with multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection. In Study 2 (N = 424), higher levels of ethnic protection, and lower levels of multicultural acquisition, emerged in the experimental group primed with indirect, versus direct, intercultural contact. Furthermore, intercultural threat was negatively, and global identity positively, associated with multicultural acquisition, while intercultural threat was positively, and global identity negatively, associated with ethnic protection. Results are discussed in relation to similarities and differences across direct and indirect intercultural contact, providing a nuanced understanding of contemporary intercultural contact and globalization-based acculturation among majority populations.",

keywords = "Acculturation, Contact hypothesis, Cultural threat, Globalization, Immigration attitudes, Intercultural relations, Social identity, IMMIGRANTS, INTERGROUP CONTACT, MODEL, CULTURE, ATTITUDES, THREAT, IDENTITY, REMOTE ACCULTURATION, MULTICULTURALISM, EXCLUSIONARY REACTIONS",

author = "Simon Ozer and Kunst, {Jonas R.} and Schwartz, {Seth J.}",

year = "2021",

month = sep,

doi = "10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.07.012",

language = "English",

volume = "84",

pages = "155--167",

journal = "International Journal of Intercultural Relations",

issn = "0147-1767",

publisher = "Pergamon Press",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Investigating Direct and Indirect Globalization-Based Acculturation

AU - Ozer, Simon

AU - Kunst, Jonas R.

AU - Schwartz, Seth J.

PY - 2021/9

Y1 - 2021/9

N2 - Cultural globalization affects most people around the world in contemporary, modern societies. The resulting intercultural contact have been examined using the theory of globalization-based acculturation. However, little is known about possible differences and similarities in processes underlying the effects of direct (e.g., through contact with immigrants) and indirect (e.g., engagement with cultural elements through media) forms of new cultural exposure. Drawing on the contact hypothesis, social identity theory, and symbolic threat theory, we examined whether perceived intercultural threat and local and global identities would explain whether both forms of contact result in multicultural acquisition or in ethnic protection. In Study 1 (N = 402), indirect, but not direct, intercultural contact was positively associated with multicultural acquisition; and both types of intercultural contact were negatively linked with ethnic protection. Global identity significantly mediated the association of both direct and indirect intercultural contact with both multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection, whereas perceived cultural threat only significantly mediated the associations of direct intercultural contact with multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection. In Study 2 (N = 424), higher levels of ethnic protection, and lower levels of multicultural acquisition, emerged in the experimental group primed with indirect, versus direct, intercultural contact. Furthermore, intercultural threat was negatively, and global identity positively, associated with multicultural acquisition, while intercultural threat was positively, and global identity negatively, associated with ethnic protection. Results are discussed in relation to similarities and differences across direct and indirect intercultural contact, providing a nuanced understanding of contemporary intercultural contact and globalization-based acculturation among majority populations.

AB - Cultural globalization affects most people around the world in contemporary, modern societies. The resulting intercultural contact have been examined using the theory of globalization-based acculturation. However, little is known about possible differences and similarities in processes underlying the effects of direct (e.g., through contact with immigrants) and indirect (e.g., engagement with cultural elements through media) forms of new cultural exposure. Drawing on the contact hypothesis, social identity theory, and symbolic threat theory, we examined whether perceived intercultural threat and local and global identities would explain whether both forms of contact result in multicultural acquisition or in ethnic protection. In Study 1 (N = 402), indirect, but not direct, intercultural contact was positively associated with multicultural acquisition; and both types of intercultural contact were negatively linked with ethnic protection. Global identity significantly mediated the association of both direct and indirect intercultural contact with both multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection, whereas perceived cultural threat only significantly mediated the associations of direct intercultural contact with multicultural acquisition and ethnic protection. In Study 2 (N = 424), higher levels of ethnic protection, and lower levels of multicultural acquisition, emerged in the experimental group primed with indirect, versus direct, intercultural contact. Furthermore, intercultural threat was negatively, and global identity positively, associated with multicultural acquisition, while intercultural threat was positively, and global identity negatively, associated with ethnic protection. Results are discussed in relation to similarities and differences across direct and indirect intercultural contact, providing a nuanced understanding of contemporary intercultural contact and globalization-based acculturation among majority populations.

KW - Acculturation

KW - Contact hypothesis

KW - Cultural threat

KW - Globalization

KW - Immigration attitudes

KW - Intercultural relations

KW - Social identity

KW - IMMIGRANTS

KW - INTERGROUP CONTACT

KW - MODEL

KW - CULTURE

KW - ATTITUDES

KW - THREAT

KW - IDENTITY

KW - REMOTE ACCULTURATION

KW - MULTICULTURALISM

KW - EXCLUSIONARY REACTIONS

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.07.012

DO - 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2021.07.012

M3 - Journal article

SN - 0147-1767

VL - 84

SP - 155

EP - 167

JO - International Journal of Intercultural Relations

JF - International Journal of Intercultural Relations

ER -

Investigating Direct and Indirect Globalization-Based Acculturation

Abstract

Adgang til dokumentet

Fingeraftryk

Citationsformater