Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
Improved perception of work following a stress management intervention. / Manford, W; Petersen, G L; Willert, M V.
I: Occupational Medicine, Bind 72, Nr. 9, 12.2022, s. 629–635.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Improved perception of work following a stress management intervention
AU - Manford, W
AU - Petersen, G L
AU - Willert, M V
N1 - © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
PY - 2022/12
Y1 - 2022/12
N2 - BACKGROUND: In the work and stress literature, surprisingly few studies of stress management interventions have evaluated effects on the perceived psychosocial work environment. Using data from a randomized controlled trial we investigated whether the perceived psychosocial work environment and overcommitment to work improved following a group-based, cognitive-behavioural stress management intervention.AIMS: We hypothesized that the participants would experience less job demand, overcommitment and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) as well as higher job control following the intervention.METHODS: Using a wait-list controlled design, 102 participants were randomized to either an intervention group or a wait-list control group. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and follow-up after three, six and nine months, and analysed using mixed model univariate repeated measures analyses of variance. Results are presented as effect sizes using Cohen's d with confidence intervals (95% CI).RESULTS: Changes from 0 to 3 months for the intervention group were significantly superior to changes for the wait-list control group on all outcomes. The controlled effect size for job demands was d = 0.42 (0.01-0.84 95% CI), for job control d = 0.39 (0.06-0.71 95% CI), for effort-reward imbalance d = 0.61 (0.22-1.01 95% CI) and for overcommitment d = 0.44 (0.06-0.81 95% CI). Improvements were maintained at three months follow-up after the end of treatment.CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved the perceived psychosocial work environment and attitude to work with small-medium effect sizes. To our knowledge, this is the first paper from a randomized controlled trial of a stress-management intervention reporting on these important outcomes.
AB - BACKGROUND: In the work and stress literature, surprisingly few studies of stress management interventions have evaluated effects on the perceived psychosocial work environment. Using data from a randomized controlled trial we investigated whether the perceived psychosocial work environment and overcommitment to work improved following a group-based, cognitive-behavioural stress management intervention.AIMS: We hypothesized that the participants would experience less job demand, overcommitment and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) as well as higher job control following the intervention.METHODS: Using a wait-list controlled design, 102 participants were randomized to either an intervention group or a wait-list control group. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and follow-up after three, six and nine months, and analysed using mixed model univariate repeated measures analyses of variance. Results are presented as effect sizes using Cohen's d with confidence intervals (95% CI).RESULTS: Changes from 0 to 3 months for the intervention group were significantly superior to changes for the wait-list control group on all outcomes. The controlled effect size for job demands was d = 0.42 (0.01-0.84 95% CI), for job control d = 0.39 (0.06-0.71 95% CI), for effort-reward imbalance d = 0.61 (0.22-1.01 95% CI) and for overcommitment d = 0.44 (0.06-0.81 95% CI). Improvements were maintained at three months follow-up after the end of treatment.CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved the perceived psychosocial work environment and attitude to work with small-medium effect sizes. To our knowledge, this is the first paper from a randomized controlled trial of a stress-management intervention reporting on these important outcomes.
U2 - 10.1093/occmed/kqac091
DO - 10.1093/occmed/kqac091
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 36130174
VL - 72
SP - 629
EP - 635
JO - Occupational Medicine
JF - Occupational Medicine
SN - 0962-7480
IS - 9
ER -