Improved perception of work following a stress management intervention

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Improved perception of work following a stress management intervention. / Manford, W; Petersen, G L; Willert, M V.

I: Occupational Medicine, Bind 72, Nr. 9, 12.2022, s. 629–635.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

Manford, W, Petersen, GL & Willert, MV 2022, 'Improved perception of work following a stress management intervention', Occupational Medicine, bind 72, nr. 9, s. 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/occmed/kqac091

APA

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Manford W, Petersen GL, Willert MV. Improved perception of work following a stress management intervention. Occupational Medicine. 2022 dec.;72(9):629–635. Epub 2022 sep. 20. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqac091

Author

Manford, W ; Petersen, G L ; Willert, M V. / Improved perception of work following a stress management intervention. I: Occupational Medicine. 2022 ; Bind 72, Nr. 9. s. 629–635.

Bibtex

@article{e48dc9c33cf04a64ae8af7c92de6fb9e,
title = "Improved perception of work following a stress management intervention",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: In the work and stress literature, surprisingly few studies of stress management interventions have evaluated effects on the perceived psychosocial work environment. Using data from a randomized controlled trial we investigated whether the perceived psychosocial work environment and overcommitment to work improved following a group-based, cognitive-behavioural stress management intervention.AIMS: We hypothesized that the participants would experience less job demand, overcommitment and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) as well as higher job control following the intervention.METHODS: Using a wait-list controlled design, 102 participants were randomized to either an intervention group or a wait-list control group. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and follow-up after three, six and nine months, and analysed using mixed model univariate repeated measures analyses of variance. Results are presented as effect sizes using Cohen's d with confidence intervals (95% CI).RESULTS: Changes from 0 to 3 months for the intervention group were significantly superior to changes for the wait-list control group on all outcomes. The controlled effect size for job demands was d = 0.42 (0.01-0.84 95% CI), for job control d = 0.39 (0.06-0.71 95% CI), for effort-reward imbalance d = 0.61 (0.22-1.01 95% CI) and for overcommitment d = 0.44 (0.06-0.81 95% CI). Improvements were maintained at three months follow-up after the end of treatment.CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved the perceived psychosocial work environment and attitude to work with small-medium effect sizes. To our knowledge, this is the first paper from a randomized controlled trial of a stress-management intervention reporting on these important outcomes.",
author = "W Manford and Petersen, {G L} and Willert, {M V}",
note = "{\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.",
year = "2022",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1093/occmed/kqac091",
language = "English",
volume = "72",
pages = "629–635",
journal = "Occupational Medicine",
issn = "0962-7480",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "9",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Improved perception of work following a stress management intervention

AU - Manford, W

AU - Petersen, G L

AU - Willert, M V

N1 - © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society of Occupational Medicine. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

PY - 2022/12

Y1 - 2022/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: In the work and stress literature, surprisingly few studies of stress management interventions have evaluated effects on the perceived psychosocial work environment. Using data from a randomized controlled trial we investigated whether the perceived psychosocial work environment and overcommitment to work improved following a group-based, cognitive-behavioural stress management intervention.AIMS: We hypothesized that the participants would experience less job demand, overcommitment and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) as well as higher job control following the intervention.METHODS: Using a wait-list controlled design, 102 participants were randomized to either an intervention group or a wait-list control group. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and follow-up after three, six and nine months, and analysed using mixed model univariate repeated measures analyses of variance. Results are presented as effect sizes using Cohen's d with confidence intervals (95% CI).RESULTS: Changes from 0 to 3 months for the intervention group were significantly superior to changes for the wait-list control group on all outcomes. The controlled effect size for job demands was d = 0.42 (0.01-0.84 95% CI), for job control d = 0.39 (0.06-0.71 95% CI), for effort-reward imbalance d = 0.61 (0.22-1.01 95% CI) and for overcommitment d = 0.44 (0.06-0.81 95% CI). Improvements were maintained at three months follow-up after the end of treatment.CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved the perceived psychosocial work environment and attitude to work with small-medium effect sizes. To our knowledge, this is the first paper from a randomized controlled trial of a stress-management intervention reporting on these important outcomes.

AB - BACKGROUND: In the work and stress literature, surprisingly few studies of stress management interventions have evaluated effects on the perceived psychosocial work environment. Using data from a randomized controlled trial we investigated whether the perceived psychosocial work environment and overcommitment to work improved following a group-based, cognitive-behavioural stress management intervention.AIMS: We hypothesized that the participants would experience less job demand, overcommitment and effort-reward imbalance (ERI) as well as higher job control following the intervention.METHODS: Using a wait-list controlled design, 102 participants were randomized to either an intervention group or a wait-list control group. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and follow-up after three, six and nine months, and analysed using mixed model univariate repeated measures analyses of variance. Results are presented as effect sizes using Cohen's d with confidence intervals (95% CI).RESULTS: Changes from 0 to 3 months for the intervention group were significantly superior to changes for the wait-list control group on all outcomes. The controlled effect size for job demands was d = 0.42 (0.01-0.84 95% CI), for job control d = 0.39 (0.06-0.71 95% CI), for effort-reward imbalance d = 0.61 (0.22-1.01 95% CI) and for overcommitment d = 0.44 (0.06-0.81 95% CI). Improvements were maintained at three months follow-up after the end of treatment.CONCLUSIONS: The intervention improved the perceived psychosocial work environment and attitude to work with small-medium effect sizes. To our knowledge, this is the first paper from a randomized controlled trial of a stress-management intervention reporting on these important outcomes.

U2 - 10.1093/occmed/kqac091

DO - 10.1093/occmed/kqac091

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36130174

VL - 72

SP - 629

EP - 635

JO - Occupational Medicine

JF - Occupational Medicine

SN - 0962-7480

IS - 9

ER -