How Getting the Facts Right Can Fuel Partisan-Motivated Reasoning

Martin Bisgaard*

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

381 Downloads (Pure)


Scholars often evaluate citizens' democratic competence by focusing on their ability to get relevant facts right. In this article, I show why this approach can yield misleading conclusions about citizen competence. I argue that although citizens with strong partisan loyalties might be forced to accept the same facts, they find alternative ways to rationalize reality. One such way, I show, is through the selective attribution of credit and blame. With four randomized experiments, conducted in diverse national settings and containing closed- as well as open-ended questions, I find that as partisans correctly updated economic beliefs to reflect new facts, they conversely attributed responsibility in a highly selective fashion. Although partisans might acknowledge the same facts, they are apt in seizing on and producing attributional arguments that fit their preferred worldviews.

TidsskriftAmerican Journal of Political Science
Sider (fra-til)824-839
Antal sider16
StatusUdgivet - 2019


Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'How Getting the Facts Right Can Fuel Partisan-Motivated Reasoning'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.