How Digital Tools Impact Convergent and Divergent Thinking in Design Ideation

Jonas Frich Pedersen*, Midas Nouwens, Kim Halskov, Peter Dalsgaard

*Corresponding author af dette arbejde

Publikation: Bidrag til bog/antologi/rapport/proceedingKonferencebidrag i proceedingsForskning

22 Citationer (Scopus)

Abstract

Digital tools that support creative activities are ubiquitous in the design industry, yet practitioners appear to prefer pen and paper for design ideation. To better understand this exception, we conducted a comparative study between analog and digital tools and their impact on the divergent and convergent thinking patterns of groups of designers. We analysed how 24 participants solved comparable design ideation tasks in two conditions using linkographic protocol analysis - a notation method that focuses on identifying and linking small steps in the design process called moves. Our findings suggest that digital ideation tools yield more convergent thinking compared to analog tools, with no discernible impact on general productivity or divergent thinking.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TitelCHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems : Making Waves, Combining Strengths
Antal sider11
UdgivelsesstedNew York
ForlagAssociation for Computing Machinery
Publikationsdato2021
Artikelnummer431
ISBN (Elektronisk)9781450380966
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2021
BegivenhedCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Online, Japan
Varighed: 8 maj 202113 maj 2021
https://chi2021.acm.org

Konference

KonferenceCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
LokationOnline
Land/OmrådeJapan
Periode08/05/202113/05/2021
Internetadresse

Fingeraftryk

Dyk ned i forskningsemnerne om 'How Digital Tools Impact Convergent and Divergent Thinking in Design Ideation'. Sammen danner de et unikt fingeraftryk.

Citationsformater