Aarhus Universitets segl

Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics. / Aagaard, Kaare; Mongeon, Philippe; Ramos-Vielba, Irene et al.
I: PLOS ONE, Bind 16, Nr. 5, e0251488, 05.2021.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

Aagaard, K, Mongeon, P, Ramos-Vielba, I & Thomas, DA 2021, 'Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics', PLOS ONE, bind 16, nr. 5, e0251488. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251488

APA

Aagaard, K., Mongeon, P., Ramos-Vielba, I., & Thomas, D. A. (2021). Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics. PLOS ONE, 16(5), artikel e0251488. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251488

CBE

Aagaard K, Mongeon P, Ramos-Vielba I, Thomas DA. 2021. Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics. PLOS ONE. 16(5):Article e0251488. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251488

MLA

Vancouver

Aagaard K, Mongeon P, Ramos-Vielba I, Thomas DA. Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics. PLOS ONE. 2021 maj;16(5):e0251488. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251488

Author

Aagaard, Kaare ; Mongeon, Philippe ; Ramos-Vielba, Irene et al. / Getting to the bottom of research funding : Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics. I: PLOS ONE. 2021 ; Bind 16, Nr. 5.

Bibtex

@article{93b24994b4ab489fa29a9e8480f82790,
title = "Getting to the bottom of research funding: Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics",
abstract = "Research funding is an important factor for public science. Funding may affect which research topics get addressed, and what research outputs are produced. However, funding has often been studied simplistically, using top-down or system-led perspectives. Such approaches often restrict analysis to confined national funding landscapes or single funding organizations and instruments in isolation. This overlooks interlinkages, broader funding researchers might access, and trends of growing funding complexity. This paper instead frames a {\textquoteleft}bottom-up{\textquoteright} approach that analytically distinguishes between increasing levels of aggregation of funding instrument co-use. Funding of research outputs is selected as one way to test this approach, with levels traced via funding acknowledgements (FAs) in papers published 2009–18 by researchers affiliated to Denmark, the Netherlands or Norway, in two test research fields (Food Science, Renewable Energy Research). Three funding aggrega- tion levels are delineated: at the bottom, {\textquoteleft}funding configurations{\textquoteright} of funding instruments co- used by individual researchers (from single-authored papers with two or more FAs); a mid- dle, {\textquoteleft}funding amalgamations{\textquoteright} level, of instruments co-used by collaborating researchers (from multi-authored papers with two or more FAs); and a {\textquoteleft}co-funding network{\textquoteright} of instru- ments co-used across all researchers active in a research field (all papers with two or more FAs). All three levels are found to include heterogenous funding co-use from inside and out- side the test countries. There is also co-funding variety in terms of instrument {\textquoteleft}type{\textquoteright} (public, private, university or non-profit) and {\textquoteleft}origin{\textquoteright} (domestic, foreign or supranational). Limitations of the approach are noted, as well as its applicability for future analyses not using paper FAs to address finer details of research funding dynamics.",
author = "Kaare Aagaard and Philippe Mongeon and Irene Ramos-Vielba and Thomas, {Duncan Andrew}",
year = "2021",
month = may,
doi = "10.1371/journal.pone.0251488",
language = "English",
volume = "16",
journal = "PLOS ONE",
issn = "1932-6203",
publisher = "public library of science",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Getting to the bottom of research funding

T2 - Acknowledging the complexity of funding dynamics

AU - Aagaard, Kaare

AU - Mongeon, Philippe

AU - Ramos-Vielba, Irene

AU - Thomas, Duncan Andrew

PY - 2021/5

Y1 - 2021/5

N2 - Research funding is an important factor for public science. Funding may affect which research topics get addressed, and what research outputs are produced. However, funding has often been studied simplistically, using top-down or system-led perspectives. Such approaches often restrict analysis to confined national funding landscapes or single funding organizations and instruments in isolation. This overlooks interlinkages, broader funding researchers might access, and trends of growing funding complexity. This paper instead frames a ‘bottom-up’ approach that analytically distinguishes between increasing levels of aggregation of funding instrument co-use. Funding of research outputs is selected as one way to test this approach, with levels traced via funding acknowledgements (FAs) in papers published 2009–18 by researchers affiliated to Denmark, the Netherlands or Norway, in two test research fields (Food Science, Renewable Energy Research). Three funding aggrega- tion levels are delineated: at the bottom, ‘funding configurations’ of funding instruments co- used by individual researchers (from single-authored papers with two or more FAs); a mid- dle, ‘funding amalgamations’ level, of instruments co-used by collaborating researchers (from multi-authored papers with two or more FAs); and a ‘co-funding network’ of instru- ments co-used across all researchers active in a research field (all papers with two or more FAs). All three levels are found to include heterogenous funding co-use from inside and out- side the test countries. There is also co-funding variety in terms of instrument ‘type’ (public, private, university or non-profit) and ‘origin’ (domestic, foreign or supranational). Limitations of the approach are noted, as well as its applicability for future analyses not using paper FAs to address finer details of research funding dynamics.

AB - Research funding is an important factor for public science. Funding may affect which research topics get addressed, and what research outputs are produced. However, funding has often been studied simplistically, using top-down or system-led perspectives. Such approaches often restrict analysis to confined national funding landscapes or single funding organizations and instruments in isolation. This overlooks interlinkages, broader funding researchers might access, and trends of growing funding complexity. This paper instead frames a ‘bottom-up’ approach that analytically distinguishes between increasing levels of aggregation of funding instrument co-use. Funding of research outputs is selected as one way to test this approach, with levels traced via funding acknowledgements (FAs) in papers published 2009–18 by researchers affiliated to Denmark, the Netherlands or Norway, in two test research fields (Food Science, Renewable Energy Research). Three funding aggrega- tion levels are delineated: at the bottom, ‘funding configurations’ of funding instruments co- used by individual researchers (from single-authored papers with two or more FAs); a mid- dle, ‘funding amalgamations’ level, of instruments co-used by collaborating researchers (from multi-authored papers with two or more FAs); and a ‘co-funding network’ of instru- ments co-used across all researchers active in a research field (all papers with two or more FAs). All three levels are found to include heterogenous funding co-use from inside and out- side the test countries. There is also co-funding variety in terms of instrument ‘type’ (public, private, university or non-profit) and ‘origin’ (domestic, foreign or supranational). Limitations of the approach are noted, as well as its applicability for future analyses not using paper FAs to address finer details of research funding dynamics.

U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0251488

DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0251488

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33979400

VL - 16

JO - PLOS ONE

JF - PLOS ONE

SN - 1932-6203

IS - 5

M1 - e0251488

ER -