Juridisk Institut

Fracking Frames and the Courts

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Dokumenter

DOI

This article utilises the concept of policy framing to examine regulatory choices and the contestation of such choices in the context of hydraulic fracturing in the UK. The article makes no argument about the merits of fracking in the UK context, but rather explores how the institutional choices and design serve to shape the legal reasoning, thereby defining the ability of actors outside the London government to engage with its efforts to govern. Through the lens of recent judicial decisions in which claimants have sought to challenge privileged policy frames supportive of hydraulic fracturing, the article finds that the deferential approach taken by the courts serves to reinforce privileged frames, resulting in there being little scope to challenge such frames.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEnvironmental Law Review
Vol/bind20
Nummer4
Sider (fra-til)202-212
Antal sider11
ISSN1461-4529
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2018
Eksternt udgivetJa

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 222467456