Fitness consequences of artificial diets with different macronutrient composition for the predatory bug Orius majusculus

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  • Marta Montoro, Kobenhavns Universitet
  • ,
  • Patrick De Clercq, Ghent University
  • ,
  • Johannes Overgaard
  • Lene Sigsgaard, Kobenhavns Universitet

The commercial production of Orius spp. (Hemiptera: Anthocoridae), including Orius majusculus (Reuter), relies on the use of eggs of Ephestia kuehniella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) as rearing diet. However, E. kuehniella eggs have become an expensive fodder thus increasing the price of these key biological control agents. The use of artificial diets potentially decreases the production costs. In this regard, establishing a link between dietary composition and fitness could advance the development of an optimum alternative artificial diet for these predatory insects. The aim of the current study was to test the effect of six artificial diets with different macronutrient composition on the development and reproductive fitness of O. majusculus when compared with the effect of E. kuehniella eggs. In general, nymphal survival was not affected by diet, whereas development was slightly delayed on artificial diets. However, female body mass and fecundity were significantly lower on all of the artificial diets compared with the E. kuehniella eggs diet, suggesting that artificial diets were of inferior quality. Within artificial diets, females fed the viable diet with highest content in lipid laid more eggs than those raised on the most protein-rich diets. We found there was some variation in carcass composition between the O. majusculus fed the various diets, but these variations did not match the differences found in the fitness parameters measured.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata
Vol/bind168
Nummer6-7
Sider (fra-til)492-501
Antal sider10
ISSN0013-8703
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jul. 2020

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 186557070