Aarhus Universitets segl

Feeding behavior and activity levels are associated with recovery status in dairy calves treated with antimicrobials for Bovine Respiratory Disease

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

  • M. C. Cantor, University of Kentucky, University of Guelph
  • ,
  • David L. Renaud, University of Guelph
  • ,
  • Heather W. Neave
  • Joao H.C. Costa, University of Kentucky

Calves with Bovine Respiratory Disease (BRD) have different feeding behavior and activity levels prior to BRD diagnosis when compared to healthy calves, but it is unknown if calves who relapse from their initial BRD diagnosis are behaviorally different from calves who recover. Using precision technologies, we aimed to identify associations of feeding behavior and activity with recovery status in dairy calves (recovered or relapsed) over the 10 days after first antimicrobial treatment for BRD. Dairy calves were health scored daily for a BRD bout (using a standard respiratory scoring system and lung ultrasonography) and received antimicrobial therapy (enrofloxacin) on day 0 of initial BRD diagnosis; 10–14 days later, recovery status was scored as either recovered or relapsed (n = 19 each). Feeding behaviors and activity were monitored using automated feeders and pedometers. Over the 10 days post-treatment, recovered calves showed improvements in starter intake and were generally more active, while relapsed calves showed sickness behaviors, including depressed feed intake, and longer lying times. These results suggest there is a new potential for precision technology devices on farms in evaluating recovery status of dairy calves that are recently treated for BRD; there is opportunity to automatically identify relapsing calves before re-emergence of clinical disease.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer4854
TidsskriftScientific Reports
Vol/bind12
ISSN2045-2322
DOI
StatusUdgivet - mar. 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
The research for this study was funded by a United States Department of Agriculture NIFA Hatch Grant Project KY007100 at the University of Kentucky. The authors do not claim any conflict of interest. The authors also thank IceRobotics for the accelerometer data, and Zinpro for donating colostrum replacer. The authors would like to thank Megan Woodrum Setser, Charlotte Pertuisel, Justine Alary, Clemence Dudoit, Mathilde Campedelli, Giulia Gobbo Rodrigues, Anna Hawkins, Gustavo Mazon, and all other staff and students for assistance with the trial.

Funding Information:
This article was funded by United States Department of Agriculture NIFA Hatch Grant Project (Grant no. KY007100).

Funding Information:
The research for this study was funded by a United States Department of Agriculture NIFA Hatch Grant Project KY007100 at the University of Kentucky. The authors do not claim any conflict of interest. The authors also thank IceRobotics for the accelerometer data, and Zinpro for donating colostrum replacer. The authors would like to thank Megan Woodrum Setser, Charlotte Pertuisel, Justine Alary, Clemence Dudoit, Mathilde Campedelli, Giulia Gobbo Rodrigues, Anna Hawkins, Gustavo Mazon, and all other staff and students for assistance with the trial.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 262886998