Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review
Forlagets udgivne version
This article investigates the relationship between distributive injustice and political obligation within the confines of the fair-play theory of political obligation. More specifically, it asks how the distribution of benefits and burdens of a cooperative scheme affects people’s fair-play obligations to that scheme. It argues that neither a sufficiency-based nor a proportionality-based approach is capable of answering that question singlehandedly. However, the two approaches can be combined in a plausible way. Noting that some of the duties that go into our fair-play obligations are ‘gradual’ and others are ‘non-gradual’, the article argues that the sufficiency-based approach explains non-gradual duties such as the duty to obey the law, and that the proportionality-based approach explains gradual duties like political participation and civic responsibility. Thus, the article contends that the fair-play theory should be extended beyond the question of legal compliance and be applied to the duties of good citizenship more generally.
Originalsprog | Engelsk |
---|---|
Tidsskrift | European Journal of Political Theory |
Vol/bind | 20 |
Nummer | 2 |
Sider (fra-til) | 167-186 |
Antal sider | 20 |
ISSN | 1474-8851 |
DOI | |
Status | Udgivet - apr. 2021 |
Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater
ID: 127666114