Exploring organisational mechanisms in PRO-based follow-up in routine outpatient care - An interpretive description of the clinician perspective

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

DOI

Background: Patient-reported outcome (PRO)-based follow-up is a new model of service delivery, where PRO measures are used as the very basis for demand-driven outpatient follow-up in patients with chronic diseases. Adopting the clinicians' perspective, we aimed to explore what happens when PRO-based follow-up is implemented in routine clinical practice. We also aimed to identify organisational mechanisms related to PRO-based follow-up. Methods: The methodological approach of this interview study is interpretive description, informed by a perspective of critical realism. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 clinicians (eight nurses and five physicians) working with PRO-based follow-up in outpatient care for epilepsy in the Central Denmark Region. Results: PRO-based follow-up gave rise to ambivalence in clinicians. Seen from the clinicians' perspective, PRO-based follow-up could both increase and decrease the quality of follow-up. Moreover, PRO-based follow-up both enhanced and impaired clinicians' work experiences. Additionally, the clinicians used strategies to ease some of the perceived disadvantages. The clinicians did extra tasks and worked around the scope of PRO-based follow-up. Thus, clinicians constituted a professional buffer as they deflected some of the negative mechanisms associated with PRO-based follow-up. Conclusions: As a model of a service delivery, PRO-based follow-up is highly dependent on the clinicians' day-to-day management of the system, and mechanisms related to routine use of PRO measures in outpatient follow-up are complex. Paying attention to the organisational settings is critical for PRO-based follow-up to improve quality of care and enhance patient-centred care.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer546
TidsskriftBMC Health Services Research
Vol/bind18
Nummer1
ISSN1472-6963
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 13 jul. 2018

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 130285332