Institut for Statskundskab

Encouraging public reporting of suspicious behaviour on rail networks

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Standard

Encouraging public reporting of suspicious behaviour on rail networks. / Pearce, Julia M.; Parker, David John; Lindekilde, Lasse; Bouhana, Noemié; Rogers, M. Brooke.

I: Policing and Society, 2019.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

Harvard

APA

Pearce, J. M., Parker, D. J., Lindekilde, L., Bouhana, N., & Rogers, M. B. (2019). Encouraging public reporting of suspicious behaviour on rail networks. Policing and Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2019.1607340

CBE

MLA

Vancouver

Author

Pearce, Julia M. ; Parker, David John ; Lindekilde, Lasse ; Bouhana, Noemié ; Rogers, M. Brooke. / Encouraging public reporting of suspicious behaviour on rail networks. I: Policing and Society. 2019.

Bibtex

@article{34d8b1a9bbcc42e59dca032a512ebbdf,
title = "Encouraging public reporting of suspicious behaviour on rail networks",
abstract = "Ongoing targeting of mass transit networks and the challenges associated with policing these large open systems means that encouraging public vigilance and reporting on railways is a counter-terrorism priority. There is, however, surprisingly little research on motivations and barriers to cooperating with the police in this context. This paper contributes to this under-researched field by presenting the findings of a survey experiment which examined (1) the role of uncertainty as a barrier for reporting suspicious behaviour on rail networks, (2) whether drivers for cooperation established in the context of traditional crime hold for reporting suspicious behaviour at train stations, and (3) whether the UK {\textquoteleft}See it. Say it. Sorted{\textquoteright} campaign is effective in encouraging reporting. Data was collected in the UK and Denmark, national contexts with differing baseline attitudes towards the police and experiences of transit terrorist attacks, to assess the extent to which public vigilance campaigns need to be adapted to address local concerns. Results suggest that future public vigilance campaigns should address differences in lay and official definitions of suspicious behaviour to reduce uncertainty as a barrier to reporting. They also demonstrate that the influence of procedural justice on cooperation via its influence on social identification with the police holds beyond the context of community policing and reporting of traditional crime. However, other drivers are likely to be more important for determining reporting suspicious behaviour on rail networks, including perceived benefits of reporting. Theoretical and practical implications of cross-national differences and similarities in responses are discussed.",
keywords = "COOPERATION, COUNTER-TERRORISM, MODEL, POLICE LEGITIMACY, PROCEDURAL JUSTICE, Procedural justice, SECURITY, SUPPORT, TRANSIT, cooperation, counter-terrorism policing, social identity",
author = "Pearce, {Julia M.} and Parker, {David John} and Lasse Lindekilde and Noemi{\'e} Bouhana and Rogers, {M. Brooke}",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1080/10439463.2019.1607340",
language = "English",
journal = "Policing and Society",
issn = "1043-9463",
publisher = "Routledge",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Encouraging public reporting of suspicious behaviour on rail networks

AU - Pearce, Julia M.

AU - Parker, David John

AU - Lindekilde, Lasse

AU - Bouhana, Noemié

AU - Rogers, M. Brooke

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Ongoing targeting of mass transit networks and the challenges associated with policing these large open systems means that encouraging public vigilance and reporting on railways is a counter-terrorism priority. There is, however, surprisingly little research on motivations and barriers to cooperating with the police in this context. This paper contributes to this under-researched field by presenting the findings of a survey experiment which examined (1) the role of uncertainty as a barrier for reporting suspicious behaviour on rail networks, (2) whether drivers for cooperation established in the context of traditional crime hold for reporting suspicious behaviour at train stations, and (3) whether the UK ‘See it. Say it. Sorted’ campaign is effective in encouraging reporting. Data was collected in the UK and Denmark, national contexts with differing baseline attitudes towards the police and experiences of transit terrorist attacks, to assess the extent to which public vigilance campaigns need to be adapted to address local concerns. Results suggest that future public vigilance campaigns should address differences in lay and official definitions of suspicious behaviour to reduce uncertainty as a barrier to reporting. They also demonstrate that the influence of procedural justice on cooperation via its influence on social identification with the police holds beyond the context of community policing and reporting of traditional crime. However, other drivers are likely to be more important for determining reporting suspicious behaviour on rail networks, including perceived benefits of reporting. Theoretical and practical implications of cross-national differences and similarities in responses are discussed.

AB - Ongoing targeting of mass transit networks and the challenges associated with policing these large open systems means that encouraging public vigilance and reporting on railways is a counter-terrorism priority. There is, however, surprisingly little research on motivations and barriers to cooperating with the police in this context. This paper contributes to this under-researched field by presenting the findings of a survey experiment which examined (1) the role of uncertainty as a barrier for reporting suspicious behaviour on rail networks, (2) whether drivers for cooperation established in the context of traditional crime hold for reporting suspicious behaviour at train stations, and (3) whether the UK ‘See it. Say it. Sorted’ campaign is effective in encouraging reporting. Data was collected in the UK and Denmark, national contexts with differing baseline attitudes towards the police and experiences of transit terrorist attacks, to assess the extent to which public vigilance campaigns need to be adapted to address local concerns. Results suggest that future public vigilance campaigns should address differences in lay and official definitions of suspicious behaviour to reduce uncertainty as a barrier to reporting. They also demonstrate that the influence of procedural justice on cooperation via its influence on social identification with the police holds beyond the context of community policing and reporting of traditional crime. However, other drivers are likely to be more important for determining reporting suspicious behaviour on rail networks, including perceived benefits of reporting. Theoretical and practical implications of cross-national differences and similarities in responses are discussed.

KW - COOPERATION

KW - COUNTER-TERRORISM

KW - MODEL

KW - POLICE LEGITIMACY

KW - PROCEDURAL JUSTICE

KW - Procedural justice

KW - SECURITY

KW - SUPPORT

KW - TRANSIT

KW - cooperation

KW - counter-terrorism policing

KW - social identity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85064709377&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10439463.2019.1607340

DO - 10.1080/10439463.2019.1607340

M3 - Journal article

JO - Policing and Society

JF - Policing and Society

SN - 1043-9463

ER -