Do Physically Stronger Males Prevail in Non-Physical Conflicts?

Til studerende
Til ph.d.er
Til medarbejdere
Institutter og fakulteter
Bibliotek
Presse

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avis › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › peer review

DOI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.06.003
Forlagets udgivne version

Among non-human animals, a key strategy to resolve conflicts without fighting relies on assessing relative fighting ability on the basis of physical cues such as size and strength. Recent studies hypothesize that the human mind also contains mechanisms for spontaneously coordinating conflict behavior on the basis of difference in physical strength, even if strength is not rationally relevant to the conflict. We provide the first direct, experimental test of the existence of such mechanisms. We do so by applying a non-physical, anonymous, economic game - the war-of-attrition - in which male contestants compete by means of perseverance to win a monetary prize. While initial studies provided some support for the prediction, the final well-powered and pre-registered study failed to support the prediction. Overall, we interpret our findings as evidence against the hypothesis that the human mind attributes relevance to physical factors that are irrelevant for the actual resolution of a conflict. We discuss implications for existing findings in the field and provide directions for further research.

Originalsprog	Engelsk
Tidsskrift	Evolution and Human Behavior
Vol/bind	42
Nummer	1
Sider (fra-til)	21-29
Antal sider	8
ISSN	1090-5138
DOI	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2020.06.003
Status	Udgivet - 2021

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 189984998

Find uddannelse

Studievejledning

Besøg AU

Kvalitet

Find

Aktuel forskning

Talent

Virksomheder

Kommuner og regioner

Gymnasier

Myndigheder

Organisation

Kontakt

Profil

Job

Om AU

Do Physically Stronger Males Prevail in Non-Physical Conflicts?

Links

DOI