Institut for Forretningsudvikling og Teknologi

Dispossessed by decarbonisation: Reducing vulnerability, injustice, and inequality in the lived experience of low-carbon pathways

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift/Konferencebidrag i tidsskrift /Bidrag til avisTidsskriftartikelForskningpeer review

  • Benjamin K. Sovacool
  • Bruno Turnheim, University of Sussex Business School, Manchester University
  • ,
  • Andrew Hook, University of Sussex Business School
  • ,
  • Andrea Brock, University of Sussex
  • ,
  • Mari Martiskainen, University of Sussex Business School

This study examines the justice and equity implications of four low-carbon transitions, and it reveals the “lived experiences” of decarbonisation as manifested across Africa and Europe. Based on extensive, original mixed methods empirical research – including expert interviews, focus groups, internet forums, community interviews, and extended site visits and naturalistic observation – it asks: How are four specific decarbonisation pathways linked to negative impacts within specific communities? Relatedly, what vulnerabilities do these transitions exacerbate in these communities? Lastly, how can such vulnerabilities be better addressed with policy? The paper documents a troublesome cohabitation between French wineries and nuclear power, the negative effects on labor groups and workers in Eastern Germany by a transition to solar energy, the stark embodied externalities in electronic waste (e-waste) flows from smart meters accumulating in Ghana, and the precarious exploitation of children involved in cobalt mining for electric vehicle batteries in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The aims and objectives of the study are threefold: (1) to showcase how four very different vulnerable communities have been affected by the negative impacts of decarbonisation; (2) to reveal tensions and tradeoffs between European transitions and local and global justice concerns; and (3) to inform energy and climate policy. In identifying these objectives, our goal is not to stop or slow down all low-carbon transitions. Rather, the study suggests that the research and policy communities ought to account for, and seek to minimize, a broader range of social and environmental sustainability risks. Sustainability transitions and decarbonisation pathways must become more egalitarian, fair, and just.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
Artikelnummer105116
TidsskriftWorld Development
Vol/bind137
ISSN0305-750X
DOI
StatusUdgivet - jan. 2021

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 730403 ?Innovation pathways, strategies and policies for the Low-Carbon Transition in Europe (INNOPATHS)?. The content of this deliverable does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed herein lies entirely with the author(s). The Authors would like to thank Dr Lucy Baker at the University of Sussex for her constructive feedback in the development of this research.

Funding Information:
This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 730403 “Innovation pathways, strategies and policies for the Low-Carbon Transition in Europe (INNOPATHS)”. The content of this deliverable does not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed herein lies entirely with the author(s). The Authors would like to thank Dr Lucy Baker at the University of Sussex for her constructive feedback in the development of this research.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 The Author(s)

Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Se relationer på Aarhus Universitet Citationsformater

ID: 213447266